Is starknet-plum.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a single-page website titled "Starknet", served from a project subdomain of a general-purpose application-hosting platform rather than from a dedicated, independently branded domain. The captured homepage returned a normal response with a modest amount of text. The available analysis did not establish a specific product, business model, or operator behind the page, so its apparent purpose is limited to presenting itself under the name of a well-known blockchain ecosystem.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site shows confirmed contradictory signals. It is blacklisted by external threat intelligence. A large share of the security engines that scanned it classed it as malicious, including several tier-one vendors. That level of detection independently triggered the most severe reputational cap available. No phishing page, brand-impersonation artifact, or conflicting legal identity was observed on the page itself. The risk therefore rests on the external detections, and the specific threat category behind them was not itemised. The presentation under a prominent ecosystem name, on a free project subdomain of a hosting platform, is the pattern that typically accompanies lookalike or lure pages. That is a risk consideration and not a finding of impersonation. Browser-behaviour testing was comparatively benign. Three sessions completed with no external data submissions, no wallet-connection prompts, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no content cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of drive-by credential or wallet theft during passive viewing. It does not offset the detections, because malicious behaviour can be gated behind specific visitors, referrers, or later content changes. A large volume of abuse reports exists against one of the shared hosting addresses. Those reports belong to the platform's shared address space and are not attributable to this site, so they are discounted and carry no weight in this assessment. No contact-channel anomaly was identified. Evidence:

• Homepage and external reputation: 14 security engines flagged the site as malicious and 2 as suspicious, including three tier-one vendors, which triggered the maximum-severity reputational cap.
• Browser-behaviour testing: 3 of 3 runs completed with 0 external requests, no wallet-provider interaction, no clipboard writes, no hidden forms, and no cloaking.
• Shared hosting address: 107 abuse reports apply to a shared platform address, with zero abuse confidence, and are discounted as non-attributable.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page does not tie the site to a named legal entity, licence, or registered operator, and its on-site disclosure position remains unclear. The real-world operator is not independently verified, so the site's use of the "Starknet" name cannot be treated as evidence of affiliation with any project of that name. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputational record matched the site. The absence of such a record is neutral and does not support or undermine legitimacy. The site's valid, mainstream-issued transport encryption confirms only that traffic is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site or whether it is safe. Evidence:

• Homepage: titled "Starknet", with no identifiable operator, company name, or licensing statement in the captured content.
• Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27 with 32 days remaining.
• Third-party broker dataset: no match for this site.

What to Verify Next

The priority is to establish whether this deployment is operated by, or authorised by, the organisation whose name it carries. That check should use the official website, documentation, and social channels reached independently of this site, not links on it. The listing status should be rechecked against current threat-intelligence sources before any further interaction, since a clean re-evaluation would change the picture and continued detection would confirm it. Any app, wallet, or download prompt encountered here should be treated as unverified until the operator is confirmed through those independent routes. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed only through the verified project's own publications. Evidence:

• Homepage: the page title is the only identity claim the captured content offers, and no corroborating operator information accompanies it.
• External reputation: current detections remain active, so a recheck should compare against the 14 malicious and 2 suspicious classifications recorded in this assessment.
• Hosting: the page sits on a project subdomain of a shared platform, so domain ownership cannot be inferred from the address.

Summary Verdict

The site is assessed at an elevated risk level and should be regarded as unsafe for sensitive interaction. Confirmed external threat detections are decisive, and the benign browser behaviour and the valid encryption are insufficient to outweigh them. Apparent legitimacy is not supported, and the operator's identity remains unestablished.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is hosted on Amazon-backed address space (AS16509) and is fronted by the Vercel platform's CDN/WAF layer. All six observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin server was visible. This is a mitigating factor for availability and basic network hygiene. The edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the underlying host and can mask rapid content swaps. Protective infrastructure cannot offset the reputational risk and is not evidence of legitimacy.

Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to passive, read-only viewing, if it is visited at all. No login, credential entry, wallet connection, download, or financial transaction should take place on it unless the operator is independently confirmed and the external detections have cleared.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 107 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.