Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 11 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENETServer in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website sits on a free, shared hosting subdomain of a developer-pages platform. Its hostname is styled like a telecom-token banking portal, with the words "telcoins", "bank" and "net" chained together. When the site was captured, the visitor-facing page was a security interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning rather than a normal homepage. Only a very small amount of text was retrievable, so the site's apparent purpose is an online banking or crypto-account portal presented under a brand-style name, and that purpose could not be confirmed from its own content.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This is a confirmed adverse-reputation case, and the report treats it as high risk. The domain is blacklisted: a large cluster of independent security engines currently classifies it as malicious. These include several tier-one endpoint-security vendors, and the volume of detections is enough on its own to trigger an automatic critical-risk override. Automated capture of the homepage was answered with an access challenge, and the page that rendered carried a suspected-phishing warning title. That corroborates the external detections rather than contradicting them. The hostname format is also a recognised lure pattern. A banking-style brand string is appended to a free subdomain of a shared hosting platform, which gives the operator no verifiable brand ownership of the namespace. No conflicting legal entities were found, because there was no legal or identity content to compare. Behavioural testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or credential posts to outside parties. Those clean results do not offset the detections, because the page may serve different content to real users than it did to automated sessions. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: the page was blocked by a bot challenge, and the captured document was titled as a suspected-phishing warning.
- Reputation layer: eleven engines rated the domain malicious and one rated it suspicious, including three tier-one vendors, which triggered the critical blacklist override.
- Behavioural sandbox: about 95% of observed network activity was directed to external hosts, with 21 external XHR/fetch calls, 5 external POST requests and 16 console errors across three runs.
- Behavioural sandbox: no wallet connection attempts, clipboard writes, hidden forms or external password forms were detected.
Regulatory Verification Notes
No licence, registration number, legal entity name or physical address could be extracted. The only retrievable content was the platform's warning interstitial. This is a content gap and is not treated as proof of fraud, but here it compounds the confirmed threat detections instead of standing alone. Operator ownership is opaque, and the real-world identity behind the site could not be independently connected to any brand or person. The name "bank" implies a regulated activity, yet no supervisory authority, deposit protection or regulated status is evidenced. No third-party broker-reputation record matched this domain, so there is no external regulatory context to weigh. The site's valid transport encryption confirms only an encrypted connection and says nothing about the operator's honesty. Evidence:
- Legal and identity pages: none were retrievable, and no regulator, licence or company details appeared in the captured content.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US) on shared platform infrastructure.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-12-05 (39 days remaining).
- Broker-reputation lookup: no match for this domain.
What to Verify Next
Any dealing with an organisation behind this name should start from independent, known-good channels. The relevant brand's official website should be reached through a fresh search or a pre-existing bookmark, never through this hostname or a link that leads to it. If the brand claims a regulated banking or payments status, that status should be confirmed directly in the supervisory register of its home jurisdiction. The organisation's official support channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route. Anyone who has already visited the site and entered any details should rotate those credentials and monitor the associated accounts. Reporting the hostname to the hosting platform's abuse desk is also appropriate. Evidence:
- Hostname: a banking-style brand string on a free shared subdomain, with no brand-owned top-level domain.
- Homepage: the captured page showed a security warning and no identifiable operator, contact or product information.
- External reputation: current malicious classifications from multiple independent engines.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence places this website in the critical-risk tier. Strong, current, multi-source threat detections dominate the assessment, and the technical hygiene that is present carries no weight against them. The operator's identity is unestablished, and the site cannot be regarded as a legitimate financial or banking service on the present record.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All four observed addresses are edge servers, and no origin address could be observed, so the real hosting location cannot be independently checked. Edge-only visibility can also make it easier to swap content quickly without a visible change in hosting. Cloudflare's protections and a trusted network provider are mitigating factors only. They do not reduce the reputational risk from the confirmed detections, and they say nothing about the operator's intent.
Closing Assessment
Treat this site as unsafe for any login, credential entry, payment or financial interaction, and avoid downloading anything from it. If contact is necessary, limit it to passive viewing in an isolated environment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should change affected passwords and alert their financial institution.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY
03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev.
- The request stayed on telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c9f |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-05 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about telcoins-bank-net.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.