Is turboswap-dex.net a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

TurboSwap presents itself as a non-custodial decentralized exchange landing page. It offers token swaps, cross-chain bridging, concentrated-liquidity pools, liquid and vault staking, veTURBO governance and TURBO token rewards, and it invites visitors to connect a crypto wallet. Its apparent business model is to draw user deposits and liquidity into pools and staking vaults, and to fund the advertised yields from trading fees and token emissions.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is a clearly cautionary case. Reputation sources show a confirmed blacklist hit. A multi-engine reputation scan returns several malicious verdicts, including from two tier-one security vendors, which establishes active contradictions rather than a mere transparency concern. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were detected, so the risk comes from the threat detections and from the offer itself. The homepage promises "zero fees" and a "0.00% swap fee" while also listing fee tiers of 0.01% to 0.25%. It asserts "no security incidents" without support. It names audits by Otter, Halborn and Trail of Bits without linking any report. It advertises vault APYs up to 22.4% and pool APRs up to 42.1%, labelled "real yield". It displays headline figures of $2.4B in volume, $380M in locked value and 310K+ active users, which the page cannot substantiate. It calls itself "the only official website" without any independent way to confirm that. A copyright date of 2024 sits on a domain registered in 2026, which weakens the claim of an established protocol. Deposit-before-service is central to the model, because returns exist only after a user connects a wallet and commits funds. The behavioral run showed no external data posts, no cloaking and no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack activity. That is mildly mitigating but does not offset the detections or the unverifiable yield claims. Evidence:

• Reputation scan of the domain: 7 malicious and 3 suspicious verdicts, including two tier-one vendors, plus a confirmed external blacklist entry.
• Homepage: the fee claims contradict one another ("0.00% swap fee" against 0.01%–0.25% tiers), and the audit names carry no report links.
• Homepage: the headline volume, TVL and user counters have no verifiable source, and the live-trade feed cannot be confirmed.
• Web archive: 1 snapshot, captured 2026-07-31, with 1 year tracked and no earlier history behind the "established protocol" framing.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site names no operating company, team, registered address, licence or registration number, and it gives no contact route. For a platform that takes custody-adjacent deposits, this leaves the legal basis for operation unverifiable. The site's identity remains unverified, and nothing on the site supports a regulated-entity reading. The absence of a licence is a verification gap in its own right, but here it compounds the confirmed threat detections instead of standing alone. No third-party broker or regulatory record was matched to the site. Evidence:

• Homepage and footer: no legal entity, jurisdiction, licence number or contact address is published.
• Domain registration: registered 2026-07-30 (~0.22 years old) through Atak Domain, expiring 2027-07-30.
• Transport security: DV certificate issued by YR2, valid to 2026-10-28 (7 days remaining). It confirms an encrypted connection only, not operator identity.
• Hosting: served from AS59692 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, AE). DeFiLlama has no listing for the protocol, despite the claimed $380M TVL.

What to Verify Next

Any engagement should start from independently sourced facts, never from links or claims on this site. Audit reports should be retrieved directly from the named auditors' own channels and matched to the specific contracts. Locked-value and volume figures should be checked against independent on-chain analytics. Any claimed authorisation should be checked with the relevant financial regulator's public registry. Official project channels and contact routes should be confirmed through a source established well before this domain's creation. Evidence:

• Homepage: three audit firms are named but no report is linked, so no contract can be matched to an audit.
• Homepage: the "only official website" claim has no independent confirmation route.
• Homepage: the TVL and volume counters come from a live-metrics feed that cannot be verified from the page.

Summary Verdict

The site sits in the lowest trust tier. Confirmed threat detections, a very young domain, unverifiable yield and security claims, and a deposit-driven model all point the same way. Nothing in the available evidence outweighs them. Technical hygiene on the site is not enough to offset the reputation findings, and no real-world operator is established.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves to a single IP at a UAE-based hosting provider. No CDN or WAF stands in front of it, so the origin server is directly exposed and no protective layer is mitigating risk. Five abuse reports apply to that IP, and the provider is a shared data-centre operator, so those reports may partly reflect neighbouring tenants. The infrastructure still gives no reassurance. The domain's young age, sparse subdomain footprint and the mismatch between registry and hosting geography reinforce the cautionary reading.

Closing Assessment

Wallet connections, token approvals, deposits, liquidity provision and staking should be avoided entirely, and the site is suitable for read-only viewing at most. Any funds already committed should be reviewed, and token approvals revoked, as a precaution.

Signals weighed against the site

• AbuseIPDB: 5 reports on hosting IP 186.2.175.35 (IQWeb FZ-LLC, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 12% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.