Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
voters-etherfi.info shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 18 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 3 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENETServer in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page crypto-finance landing site on a recently created domain. Its page title reads "Save, Grow, Spend. Do more with your crypto | ether.fi", which reproduces the headline of an established liquid-staking and crypto-banking brand. The domain name pairs that brand with the word "voters", and the site appears to be aimed at visitors who expect a governance or voting portal. Its apparent purpose is to present itself as part of that brand's ecosystem and to prompt visitors to interact with it.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The decisive finding is a confirmed blacklist position. Multiple major security vendors currently classify the domain as malicious, and the aggregate detections are far above the level that independently triggers the strictest reputation safeguard. The brand-matching title and the "voters" naming pattern fit a familiar lookalike lure: a newly registered domain borrowing a known crypto brand's wording to attract users looking for a governance or claim page. Automated page analysis did not confirm an impersonation verdict, and no conflicting legal identities were found. The reputation evidence is nonetheless strong enough that the brand resemblance should be read as a serious aggravating factor. Behavioural testing observed several background requests and data submissions to non-whitelisted external destinations. This is unusual for a single landing page and is consistent with data collection or third-party redirection. No wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard tampering or hidden credential forms were observed in the test runs. That limits what has been confirmed but does not offset the blacklist position. No contact-channel anomalies were observed.
- Homepage: the page title reproduces a well-known crypto brand's tagline on an unrelated domain whose name adds "voters".
- Reputation: independent detections from several major security vendors (18 malicious, 2 suspicious) and an external blacklist hit.
- Behavioural sandbox: 6 external XHR requests and 3 external POST submissions to non-whitelisted destinations across 3 successful runs, with a large post-interaction page rebuild (1,033 DOM mutations).
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-08-07 (~0.22 years, about 80 days old), with no history in DeFi protocol directories.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site discloses no operating company, licence, registration number or governance information. The page text is short, and the real-world operator is not independently identified. Ownership details are also incomplete, which counts as ownership opacity but not as an identity contradiction. On a domain with a clean reputation this would be a minor administrative point. Here it removes any on-site basis for accountability, and it matters more because the site uses a recognised brand's wording. The site's apparent brand connection should not be taken as evidence of any real affiliation or regulated status. No third-party broker or regulatory listing was matched.
- Homepage: no legal entity, licence, registration or physical-address disclosure was found in the captured content.
- Registration: domain registered through NICENIC International Group Co., Limited on 2026-08-07, expiring 2027-08-07, with incomplete registrant details.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2027-01-03. This shows encryption but not operator identity.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
What to Verify Next
The official domain of the brand being referenced should be established through an independent route, such as a long-standing bookmark, the brand's verified social profiles, or its documented governance channels. It should not be taken from this site or from any link, message or advertisement that led to it. Any voting, claim or airdrop invitation that pointed to this domain should be checked directly with the brand's official support channels, using contact details obtained independently. If a device has already interacted with the site, the wallet's token approvals should be reviewed and any unfamiliar permissions revoked. Reuse of credentials entered on the site should be assessed.
- Homepage: the brand-matching title is the only identity cue, and it is unauthenticated.
- Reputation: current blacklist status makes any invitation that originated at this domain unreliable.
- Behavioural testing: outbound data submissions to unrecognised destinations mean any entered information may have left the site.
Summary Verdict
The deterministic assessment places this website in the lowest trust tier, with elevated risk. The negative convergence is strong: a very recent registration, confirmed multi-vendor malicious classification, brand-style wording without any verifiable affiliation, and unexplained external data flows. The valid encryption certificate and the absence of detected wallet-drainer behaviour are the only mitigating elements, and neither outweighs the reputation findings.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows the operator uses mainstream, reputable infrastructure, but it does not establish legitimacy. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the hosting and would allow content to be changed quickly without any visible change in network location.
Closing Assessment
This domain should not be used for anything beyond passive viewing, if that. Wallet connections, transaction approvals, message signing, credential entry and any payment or financial interaction should be avoided. Any approval already granted should be revoked. The site should be reported to the brand it appears to reference and to the relevant security channels.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of voters-etherfi.info.
- The request stayed on voters-etherfi.info. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-08-07. Noted
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::6815:132e |
| Name servers | uma.ns.cloudflare.com, bayan.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-03 |
| Domain age | 0.22 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-08-07 |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 18 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about voters-etherfi.info at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.