TrustSniffer stablecoin freeze report for July 31, 2026
Stablecoin issuer freezes recorded on July 31, 2026.

Stablecoin freezes on July 31, 2026

Across the networks TrustSniffer traces, issuers froze 25 addresses on July 31, 2026, immobilising about $4.94M in USDT and USDC. A freeze means the token issuer blacklisted the address on-chain, so the affected stablecoins can no longer be moved from it.

  • Ethereum: 7 freezes, $376.1k frozen
  • TRON: 18 freezes, $4.57M frozen

Largest freeze of the day

The single largest freeze on July 31, 2026 was $2.39M on TRON, on the address TJvkkzM4x4XDfG639UaKTTeek3WkfQcSkE. Open its analysis page for the full risk verdict, exposure trace, and connected addresses.

Wallets frozen on July 31, 2026

Each frozen address is listed below with the amount frozen, linking to its dedicated TrustSniffer analysis (verdict, exposure trace, and connected wallets).

  1. TJvkkzM4…fQcSkE on TRON, $2.39M frozen
  2. TVFNMGLd…dRGo on TRON, $726.8k frozen
  3. TECjJGkr…WAu1 on TRON, $615.9k frozen
  4. TJ8MQ17K…fZBw on TRON, $252.9k frozen
  5. THoF6N2p…K4Bq on TRON, $181.6k frozen
  6. 0x8efdEC…03EcE on Ethereum, $164.7k frozen
  7. TB9RgLd9…fGk8 on TRON, $120.4k frozen
  8. TWAxjerF…BkcW on TRON, $109.8k frozen
  9. TMYgeQLv…YLs on TRON, $97.9k frozen
  10. 0xFF6dDc…988D on Ethereum, $97.4k frozen
  11. TGwkRqtC…1CgT on TRON, $65.6k frozen
  12. 0x5B9225…59D4 on Ethereum, $48.8k frozen
  13. 0x1D8C50…9920 on Ethereum, $32.1k frozen
  14. 0x4B9e20…4A77 on Ethereum, $19.2k frozen
  15. 0x8f5Fd7…2439 on Ethereum, $11.9k frozen
  16. 0xd1e958…Ca31 on Ethereum, $2.0k frozen
  17. 0x7efe2f…99d5 on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  18. 0xdd9b99…36c3 on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  19. 0xd378d9…aa9f on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  20. 0x2e6f33…46e4 on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  21. 0x55de97…8322 on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  22. TURdyyAQ…EdLkr on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  23. TG3rd3vQ…3pVE72 on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  24. TVgPRsZK…Ha3uL on TRON, $0.00 frozen
  25. 0xd83426…a7a3 on TRON, $0.00 frozen

The running picture

As of July 31, 2026, TrustSniffer's freeze index counts 10,154 addresses currently frozen by stablecoin issuers across Ethereum and TRON, holding roughly $3.53B in immobilised funds, out of 11,476 addresses ever blacklisted. Browse the full picture in the live Risk Index and the sanctions directory.

How TrustSniffer tracks freezes

Every figure here comes from TrustSniffer's own on-chain monitoring: it listens directly to the USDT and USDC issuer contracts on Ethereum and TRON and records each blacklist and un-blacklist event as it happens. Bulk imports and non-issuer flags are excluded, so this report reflects real issuer freezes only. To check an address yourself, use the free wallet-risk checker; to screen a website, use the website checker.

Stablecoin freeze
An on-chain action in which a token issuer (such as Tether for USDT or Circle for USDC) blacklists a specific address, preventing the affected stablecoins from being moved from it. Issuers do this in response to sanctions, law-enforcement requests, or theft. A freeze can later be reversed by the issuer.

Frequently asked questions

What does it mean when a stablecoin wallet is frozen?

The token issuer has blacklisted the address on-chain, so the USDT or USDC held there can no longer be transferred. It is an issuer action, usually tied to sanctions, law enforcement, or theft, and it can later be reversed by the issuer.

How can I check a specific frozen wallet?

Open its link in the list above, or paste any Ethereum or TRON address into TrustSniffer's free wallet-risk checker to see its verdict, sanctioned-exposure trace, and connected addresses.

Which networks does this report cover?

TrustSniffer traces stablecoin issuer freezes on Ethereum and TRON, the two networks where the large majority of USDT and USDC freezes occur.

How current is this data?

This report reflects the freezes recorded on July 31, 2026. TrustSniffer monitors the issuer contracts continuously, and a new report is published each day.

Freezes are a lagging signal: by the time an issuer blacklists an address, the funds are often already flagged as high-risk. TrustSniffer's monitoring frequently identifies an address as a freeze candidate before the issuer acts, which is why screening a counterparty in advance, rather than after a freeze, is the safer habit.