TrustSniffer stablecoin freeze report for September 18, 2026
Stablecoin issuer freezes recorded on September 18, 2026.

Stablecoin freezes on September 18, 2026

Across the networks TrustSniffer traces, issuers froze 4 addresses on September 18, 2026, removing about $2.22M in USDT and USDC from circulation. A freeze means the token issuer blacklisted the address on-chain, so the affected stablecoins can no longer be moved from it.

  • TRON: 4 freezes, $2.22M frozen

Largest freeze of the day

The single largest freeze on September 18, 2026 was $1.59M on TRON, on the address THhAvXmdXvHvDRoHWKRxdHgdNmuKbBeRBM. Open its analysis page for the full risk verdict, exposure trace, and connected addresses.

Wallets frozen on September 18, 2026

Each frozen address is listed below with the amount frozen, linking to its dedicated TrustSniffer analysis (verdict, exposure trace, and connected wallets).

  1. THhAvXmdXvHvDRoHWKRxdHgdNmuKbBeRBM on TRON, $1.59M frozen
  2. TJMSnfutSWtnqJeTfd1rVkS8ATDa5zgzV3 on TRON, $530.0k frozen
  3. TTQF5cRDvSMWYPG7URE9RVpJomFAWLAzhG on TRON, $100.0k frozen
  4. TVAn1jqtVVgB5NgbsET8GeF6BBU3iJCCBL on TRON, $0.00 frozen

A few details in this list are worth a closer look. All four freezes on September 18, 2026 happened on TRON, and the largest one, $1.59M on THhAvXmdXvHvDRoHWKRxdHgdNmuKbBeRBM, accounts for most of the day's $2.22M total. The last entry shows $0.00 frozen, which means the issuer blacklisted the address while it held no USDT or USDC, so no funds were locked at assessment time even though the address itself is now blocked. A freeze on its own does not tell you where the money came from or who controls the wallet; it only confirms that the issuer acted. To see the exposure trace and the connected wallets for any of these addresses, open its analysis page, or paste any other TRON or Ethereum address into the free wallet-risk checker.

The running picture

As of September 18, 2026, TrustSniffer's freeze index counts 10,655 addresses currently frozen by stablecoin issuers across TRON, holding roughly $3.52B in immobilised funds, out of 11,993 addresses ever blacklisted. Browse the full picture in the live Risk Index and the sanctions directory.

How TrustSniffer tracks freezes

Every figure here comes from TrustSniffer's own on-chain monitoring: it listens directly to the USDT and USDC issuer contracts on TRON and records each blacklist and un-blacklist event as it happens. Bulk imports and non-issuer flags are excluded, so this report reflects real issuer freezes only. To check an address yourself, use the free wallet-risk checker; to screen a website, use the website checker.

Stablecoin freeze
An on-chain action in which a token issuer (such as Tether for USDT or Circle for USDC) blacklists a specific address, preventing the affected stablecoins from being moved from it. Issuers do this in response to sanctions, law-enforcement requests, or theft. A freeze can later be reversed by the issuer.

Frequently asked questions

What does it mean when a stablecoin wallet is frozen?

The token issuer has blacklisted the address on-chain, so the USDT or USDC held there can no longer be transferred. It is an issuer action, usually tied to sanctions, law enforcement, or theft, and it can later be reversed by the issuer.

How can I check a specific frozen wallet?

Open its link in the list above, or paste any Ethereum or TRON address into TrustSniffer's free wallet-risk checker at https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk to see its verdict, sanctioned-exposure trace, and connected addresses.

Which networks does this report cover?

TrustSniffer traces stablecoin issuer freezes on Ethereum and TRON, the two networks where the large majority of USDT and USDC freezes occur.

How current is this data?

This report reflects the freezes recorded on September 18, 2026. TrustSniffer monitors the issuer contracts continuously, and a new report is published each day.

Freezes are a lagging signal: by the time an issuer blacklists an address, the funds are often already flagged as high-risk. TrustSniffer's monitoring frequently identifies an address as a freeze candidate before the issuer acts, which is why screening a counterparty in advance, rather than after a freeze, is the safer habit.