Verdict
7601.bet shows high-risk / scam indicators.
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
| What this site appears to be | A gambling/betting site announcement page describing a site upgrade, advising users to contact online customer service if login issues occur, and mentioning deposit/withdraw operations. Contains a reference to the brand name 'bet365' and operational downtime notice. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 17 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this count | Noted |
| Domain age | 6.6 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2021Public history exists | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
No screenshot is retained for this report.
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 3 to 10 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2021.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
7601.bet presents itself as an online gambling and betting platform, with navigation for live dealers, sports wagering, promotional offers, gaming platforms, customer service, and deposit and withdrawal operations. Its apparent business model is to receive player funds and facilitate in-site wagering.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site presents a critical sensitive-interaction risk. External security intelligence recorded confirmed blacklist coverage, including 17 malicious detections from evaluated sources and flags from Fortinet, Kaspersky, and Sophos. This is a direct contradiction to treating the domain as a routine gambling service, even though no conflicting legal-entity names or confirmed brand-impersonation finding were supplied. The homepage also references “bet365” without establishing a relationship to that brand; this is not, by itself, a confirmed impersonation finding, but it increases the need for caution. The page describes deposits, withdrawals, account access support, and continued gameplay during service interruptions, creating an opaque value flow in which funds may be committed before the service or operator has been independently established.
- Homepage: Chinese-language gambling navigation includes live dealers, sports wagering, promotions, customer service, and deposit and withdrawal functions.
- Homepage: The maintenance notice states that users with login problems should contact online customer service and that deposits, gameplay, and withdrawals are handled during different operating periods.
- External reputation telemetry: 17 malicious detections were recorded, with Fortinet, Kaspersky, and Sophos among the flagged vendors; confirmed blacklist sources were present.
- Domain registration: Registered 2020-01-05 and approximately 6.62 years old; registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The reviewed material does not state a licensing authority or license number for the gambling operation. That is a material regulatory-disclosure gap for a business handling player deposits, although the absence of a disclosed license is a verification issue rather than proof of a scam on its own. The real-world operator remains unverified, and the available content is too sparse to establish who is legally responsible for custody of funds, dispute handling, or withdrawals. The site’s valid transport certificate and identifiable network allocation establish technical service characteristics, not regulatory authorization.
- Reviewed homepage: No gambling license authority or license number is presented in the supplied business-model content.
- Hosting telemetry: Served from AS138415 (Yancy Limited, HK); the technical record identifies the server organization as YANCYLIMITED-AS-HK - Yancy Limited, HK.
- TLS telemetry: Certificate issued by YR1 with Domain Validation (DV), valid to 2026-09-29.
- Authority context: The site has an OpenPageRank score of 2, classified as mid-band authority data; this is contextual and does not establish licensing or legitimacy.
What to Verify Next
Before any account, deposit, wagering, withdrawal, or credential activity, independently identify the legal operator and confirm any claimed gambling authorization directly with the relevant jurisdictional regulator. Confirm that the regulator, operator name, payment recipient, terms, withdrawal rules, and dispute process are consistent across independent records rather than relying on the site’s own announcements. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent, offline route, and any proposed payment should be assessed for consumer protection and recoverability.
- Homepage: Operator identity, licensing authority, and license number are not established in the reviewed content.
- Homepage: Deposit and withdrawal handling is described operationally, but the responsible legal entity and dispute framework are not identified.
- External reputation telemetry: Confirmed blacklist coverage warrants independent validation before sensitive interaction.
- Technical telemetry: TLS is DV rather than an identity-validated certificate, so encrypted transport should not be treated as proof of operator identity.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence supports a critical-risk posture for sensitive interaction with 7601.bet. Confirmed external threat detections converge with the site’s sparse, deposit-driven gambling presentation and unverified operator identity, making the website unsuitable for normal trust-based engagement.
Infrastructure Integrity
Cloudflare CDN/WAF protection is present and provides a mitigating layer against routine exposure, but it does not offset the external reputation findings. Observed Cloudflare edge infrastructure includes AS209242 addresses, while the environment also contains potential origin candidates; this is an infrastructure characteristic, not evidence of legitimacy.
- Infrastructure: Cloudflare CDN/WAF protection was identified.
- Edge telemetry: Observed edge IPs were 23.179.248.246, 23.179.248.252, and 23.179.248.7 on AS209242.
- Resolution telemetry: Six unique IPs were observed, including three edge addresses and three potential origin candidates.
Closing Assessment
Sensitive interaction should not proceed unless the operator, authorization, payment controls, and support channels are independently validated and the transaction can be protected through a reliable recovery mechanism.
Written analysis generated 2026-08-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine, behaviour in a sandbox, external reputation.
01 Governance Risk
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
02 Sensitive Interaction Risk
- The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine
signal:direct_threat - The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of 7601.bet.
- The request stayed on 7601.bet. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under GoDaddy.com, LLC. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by dns.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-01-05. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2021-11-24. Clear
- It is hosted on YANCYLIMITED-AS-HK, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | GoDaddy.com, LLC |
|---|---|
| Hosting | YANCYLIMITED-AS-HK - Yancy Limited, HK |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 23.235.185.115 |
| Name servers | ns1.dns.com, ns2.dns.com |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-09-29 |
| Domain age | 6.62 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-01-05 |
| Archive first seen | 2021-11-24 |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 17 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about 7601.bet at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.