Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 91 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Overview
The website presents itself as a free cryptocurrency wallet screening tool, titled "AML Wallet Scanner", that offers anti-money-laundering checks across several blockchain ecosystems: TRON, EVM-compatible chains, Solana, SUI and XRP. A visitor appears to be invited to submit wallet addresses for a risk check. It is a utility-style service offered at no charge and hosted as a subdomain on a shared application-hosting platform, not on a dedicated branded domain.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The evidence shows confirmed adverse reputation signals. Multiple threat-intelligence engines flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and an external blacklist listing corroborates this. Together these amount to a confirmed blacklisting and the decisive driver of the elevated-risk assessment. No brand impersonation, phishing page or conflicting legal identities were identified on the page content, so the concern rests on the external detections, not on a demonstrated impersonation. The abuse reports recorded against the hosting platform's shared edge address are a separate matter. They concern infrastructure that serves many unrelated tenants and are discounted accordingly, so they should not be read as evidence against this particular site. The site's behaviour adds context without confirming harm. In the homepage sessions, most network activity went to third-party destinations, including several data submissions to destinations outside the platform's expected services. That matters for a tool whose purpose is to receive wallet addresses, because queried addresses could be relayed to parties the visitor cannot identify. Testing found no wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site or cloaking. Identity verification of the operator was not achieved, and the page does not connect the service to any identifiable company or person.
- Homepage: external detections from several independent reputation engines, plus a blacklist listing, are the decisive adverse indicators.
- Hosting layer: 91 abuse reports on the platform's shared edge address, attributed to shared infrastructure and discounted.
- Homepage behavioural testing: 12 external XHR/fetch requests and 12 external POSTs observed, of which 3 each went to non-whitelisted destinations. External traffic reached about 93% in the heaviest session.
- Homepage behavioural testing: no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard writes, hidden forms or cloaking across 3 successful runs.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site presents itself as a compliance-adjacent screening service, yet the evidence shows no licensing status, registered operating entity, or accountable party. No third-party regulatory source confirms the site, and no broker-reputation record matched it. Operator ownership and governance are opaque, so the service's claims to perform AML analysis cannot be tied to any accountable organisation. Because a compliance-style tool depends on its operator's credibility, this gap carries more weight than it would for an ordinary informational page. Its significance here comes from the confirmed reputation signals above, not from the omission alone. The site's transport encryption is valid, but it is a basic domain-validated certificate and says nothing about who operates the service.
- Homepage: no named legal entity, registration number or regulator is presented alongside the AML screening claims.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV), valid to 2026-11-27, with 31 days remaining.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- No third-party regulatory or broker-reputation record corresponds to the site.
What to Verify Next
Before any engagement, the operator should be established independently. This means identifying who runs the service through channels outside the site and confirming that any claim to provide AML or compliance screening is backed by an accountable, registered organisation. The security vendors' detections should be re-checked directly with those vendors to see whether they are current or have been remediated. Where wallet screening is needed, an established, identifiable compliance-analytics provider should be used. The official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent route. No wallet addresses, API keys or seed phrases should be submitted to this site while those checks are outstanding.
- Homepage: the service accepts wallet-related queries across five blockchain families, so submitted addresses are the main data exposure.
- Homepage behavioural testing: outbound data submissions went to destinations that were not on the expected-services list.
- External detections: current at the time of analysis, so the listing status needs re-confirmation before any change in posture.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation findings from independent sources are decisive and are not offset by the site's technical hygiene. Legitimacy cannot be inferred, and the operator remains unidentified. The evidence supports caution proportionate to a blacklisted, anonymously operated service in a security-sensitive niche, not a finding of proven fraud.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through a content-delivery layer on Amazon-operated infrastructure, and all observed addresses are edge servers. The origin server was not observable. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It prevents independent verification of where the content is actually hosted and could allow content to be changed quickly without notice. It cannot offset the confirmed reputation risk.
Closing Assessment
The site should be treated as read-only at most. No login, credential entry, wallet-related submission or financial interaction is appropriate until the external detections are cleared and an accountable operator is identified.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY
03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 91 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.195 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 91 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.