Verdict
bscompany.es shows high-risk / scam indicators.
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
| What this site appears to be | GPT summary status=skipped | No usable content for GPT summary (clean/dom/html all empty) |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 10 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this count | Noted |
| Domain age | 17 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2009371 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: more than 10 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2009.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
bscompany.es is a website whose supplied homepage evidence does not establish a substantive visitor-facing service, product, or business model; its apparent purpose therefore remains indeterminate.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site presents a critical sensitive-interaction risk. A confirmed blacklist condition is supported by 10 malicious and 1 suspicious external detections, including detections from two tier-one security vendors. This is materially more significant than the absence of suspicious behavior in the limited runtime assessment. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were observed, but the external threat evidence is sufficient to prevent the site from being treated as trustworthy for credentials, login activity, or financial transactions. The domain’s long historical continuity and substantial archive record do not offset the current reputation evidence; they instead create a strong-history/weak-current-page conflict that requires a security-first interpretation.
- External reputation telemetry recorded 10 malicious detections and 1 suspicious detection, with tier-one threat detection present.
- The domain has registration continuity of approximately 17.37 years, with the first archived observation dated 2009-04-05T10:21:53Z.
- The archive contains 371 snapshots spanning 2009–2026, covering 18 tracked years; its historical analysis did not identify suspicious repurposing.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site’s legal and identity disclosures are unclear in the supplied content, and no licensing or registration basis is established. Identity verification remains unknown, so any apparent legitimacy cannot be treated as proof of a real-world operator. The absence of a matching record in the available broker-reputation dataset is only contextual and does not constitute a licensing or regulatory finding. The technical controls confirm a functioning encrypted service, but they do not establish ownership, authorization, or regulatory status.
- The supplied site content does not establish a named legal operator, licensing basis, or registration number.
- The site is hosted by IONOS-AS - IONOS SE, DE on AS8560.
- The transport certificate is issued by YR1, uses Domain Validation (DV), and is valid to 2026-10-10T11:09:45+00:00.
What to Verify Next
Before any sensitive interaction, an independent party should confirm the operator’s legal identity and any claimed authorization directly with the relevant official corporate or financial-services registry. Official contact channels should be validated through an independent, offline route rather than relying solely on information presented by the site. If the site is associated with a financial offer, payment destination, or account service, the associated entity, terms, and dispute protections should be confirmed before proceeding.
- The site’s legal and identity disclosures are unclear, making independent operator verification necessary.
- No licensing or registration basis is established in the supplied site content.
- Runtime testing recorded successful responses and no wallet-connection, hidden-form, clipboard-hijacking, or cloaking behavior; these observations do not validate the operator or override the external threat detections.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is critical and unsuitable for sensitive interaction. Available evidence does not support treating the website as a trustworthy destination for credentials, account access, financial activity, or other actions requiring confidence in the operator’s identity.
Infrastructure Integrity
A CDN/WAF layer is present, and all observed addresses were associated with edge infrastructure rather than an independently observable origin. The observed infrastructure included 194.164.165.189 on AS8560 and 46.225.47.134 on AS24940; the hosting organization identified in the technical evidence is IONOS-AS - IONOS SE, DE. This protective architecture may reduce direct exposure of the origin, but it is only a mitigating infrastructure characteristic and does not counter the external reputation risk.
Closing Assessment
Prospective users should restrict activity to non-interactive observation and should not submit credentials or conduct financial transactions unless independent identity, authorization, and contact-channel checks have first been completed.
Written analysis generated 2026-08-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine, external reputation.
01 Governance Risk
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
02 Sensitive Interaction Risk
- The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine
signal:direct_threat - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of bscompany.es.
- The request stayed on bscompany.es. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2009-04-05. Clear
- It is hosted on IONOS-AS, from a server in DE. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | IONOS-AS - IONOS SE, DE |
| Country | DE |
| Server IP | 194.164.165.189 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-10-10 |
| Domain age | 17.37 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2009-04-05 |
| Archive snapshots | 371 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about bscompany.es at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.