Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
checkamlusdt.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 15 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 93 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 6 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20262 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page tool, hosted on a free shared-platform subdomain, that presents itself as a free anti-money-laundering screening service for USDT addresses on the TRON (TRC20) network. Its page title invites visitors to check a cryptocurrency address for illicit-fund exposure, and its apparent purpose is to act as a compliance-style utility for crypto holders and counterparties. No operator, company or commercial model is identified on the site.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The site is blacklisted: a large cluster of independent security engines currently flags it as malicious, and several of the best-known endpoint security vendors are among them. This external consensus is strong enough to override every mitigating technical factor. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were confirmed, and no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijacking or hidden-form behaviour was observed during sandbox runs. The threat detections alone justify a cautionary stance. A tool that asks visitors to submit crypto addresses is an attractive lure, because the input reveals financial context and invites follow-up contact. The page's browser behaviour adds concern. Most of the traffic it generated went to external destinations, including a dozen outbound data submissions, three of which went to destinations outside the known-safe set. A free "AML check" that quietly sends visitor input to third parties is a plausible data-harvesting pattern, although the exfiltration itself is unconfirmed. The abuse reports filed against the shared platform address are attributed to the hosting provider's common infrastructure and are discounted. They are not counted against this site.
- Homepage: the page presents a free USDT TRC20 address screening service under a TRON-network banner, with no named operator.
- Reputation: 15 security engines rate the site malicious and 3 rate it suspicious.
- Homepage behaviour: 12 external data requests and 12 external submissions were observed, with up to roughly 79% of activity going to external hosts.
- Domain provenance: the domain is about 172 days old (~0.47 years), with only 2 archive snapshots, both captured on 2026-05-06 (1 year tracked).
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site claims to perform AML screening, a function normally associated with regulated compliance and blockchain-analytics providers. It discloses no licence, registration, legal entity or accountable operator. Ownership and governance are opaque, and the real-world operator has not been independently connected to any known brand or person. This is a verification gap, not a finding of fraud. In combination with the threat detections, however, it removes any basis for treating the screening claims as credible. The hosting arrangement is a free shared platform subdomain, which gives no information about who runs the service. The transport-layer certificate is valid but only domain-validated, so it confirms encryption and nothing about the operator's identity. No third-party broker or regulator listing was matched.
- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number or regulator reference is published.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WR1 at domain-validation (DV) level and is valid to 2026-11-27, with 32 days remaining.
What to Verify Next
Anyone who has already used the site should treat any address, wallet detail or contact information submitted there as potentially exposed. Wallet activity should be reviewed, and any unexpected approvals revoked. Genuine AML screening should be obtained directly from an established, independently identifiable provider reached through its own official channels, not through a link to this site. If the site belongs to the reader, a compromise of the hosting account or deployment should be investigated and the content cleaned. A re-review request should follow with the security vendors that currently flag it. The official support and contact channels of any provider that the site claims to represent should be confirmed through an independent route.
- Homepage: the screening claim names no provider, so there is nothing on the site to cross-check against.
- Sandbox behaviour: three external submissions went to destinations outside the known-safe set and should be traced if the site is ever reassessed.
- Reputation: the current malicious ratings are the primary signal to track for any change.
Summary Verdict
The deterministic assessment is critical and the posture is clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat detections, a very young and thinly documented domain, and an operator with no verifiable identity converge on elevated risk for any sensitive interaction. Technical hygiene does not offset these signals, and the site's legitimacy is not established.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through a trusted CDN and edge network operated by Vercel on Amazon cloud capacity, and every observed address belongs to shared edge servers. The origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of the real host and can mask rapid content swaps, so the protective infrastructure cannot offset the threat detections. The DNS records show a short lifetime, and the site's lifecycle is consistent with an ephemeral deployment.
Closing Assessment
Interaction should be restricted to passive, read-only viewing, if the site is visited at all. No credentials, wallet connections, addresses, personal data or payments should be entered or approved, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Independent, established services should be used for any AML or compliance screening.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, history in the web archive, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS
05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 93 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of checkamlusdt.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on checkamlusdt.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-05-06. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 216.198.79.131 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.47 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-05-06 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 93 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about checkamlusdt.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.