Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
click-to-transsfer.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 18 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 85 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page site published on a Vercel-hosted subdomain and titled "Transfer Trust Wallet". Its address is a misspelled "click-to-transfer" phrase. The visible content is very short, about one line of text, and it appears designed to prompt a visitor to start a cryptocurrency wallet transfer. No product description, company profile, or service documentation is presented, so its apparent purpose is to funnel visitors into a wallet-related action rather than to operate an established business.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The evidence converges on an elevated, confirmed threat posture. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the site as malicious, including several tier-one vendors, and the volume of detections is high enough to constitute a confirmed blacklisting. The page also presents itself under a well-known wallet brand name ("Trust Wallet") while sitting on a free subdomain of a hosting platform, with a deliberately misspelled address. This is a classic lookalike pattern for wallet-themed credential or seed-phrase harvesting. The site's own page content does not by itself prove a phishing kit. Even so, the combination of a brand-evoking title, a typo-based address, a minimal page, and strong external detections is the signature of an impersonation or phishing lure. A cluster of abuse reports (85) exists on a Vercel network address in the same hosting range. These apply to shared platform infrastructure serving many unrelated customers, so they are discounted and are not attributed to this site. Sandbox runs showed no external network calls, no wallet-connect prompts, no clipboard manipulation, and no cloaking. That means no active drainer behavior was observed during capture, but it does not offset the independent threat listings. No identity contradiction between legal entities was observed, because the site names no entity at all. Evidence:
- Homepage: titled "Transfer Trust Wallet" with roughly 89 characters of visible text, no product, company, or support detail.
- Domain provenance: registered about 41 days ago (~0.11 years old), with a single archive snapshot (2026) and 1 year tracked, so there is no meaningful history.
- Homepage address: the misspelled "transsfer" form closely resembles the hosting platform's own domain, which indicates a lookalike construction.
- Behavioral capture: 3 of 3 sandbox runs succeeded with zero external requests and zero wallet-sensitive events. This is a neutral observation, not a mitigating one.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site publishes no legal, licensing, or corporate-identity pages. It discloses no operator name, registration number, jurisdiction, or terms of service. For a page that invites wallet-related transfers, this is a substantive content gap, because nothing allows the operator to be tied to a regulated or accountable entity. Third-party broker or regulatory databases returned no match, which is neutral and carries no weight as a verdict. The absence of licensing information is a verification gap in itself. The confirmed security detections are the basis for the cautionary posture. The site's real-world operator remains unidentified. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number, privacy policy, or terms page is presented.
- Transport encryption: a domain-validated TLS certificate issued by WR1 is valid to 2026-11-27 (31 days remaining). This confirms encryption only and says nothing about operator identity.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
What to Verify Next
Any claimed link to Trust Wallet should be checked only against the official brand's own channels, reached by typing its address manually or using its verified app-store listing, never through links found on this page. Any invitation to transfer funds or restore a wallet should be treated as unconfirmed until the official provider confirms it. The operator's identity and any claimed licensing should be checked against the relevant public registry. Where the site was reached through a message, advertisement, or social post, that source should be reported and checked independently. If a wallet was connected or a recovery phrase entered on this site, the affected assets should be moved to a freshly created wallet and token approvals revoked. Evidence:
- Homepage: the only content is a wallet-transfer framing, with no independently confirmable contact or operator route.
- External reputation: current multi-vendor malicious detections on this address make any prior interaction a potential exposure event.
- Domain provenance: the site is weeks old with no established history to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is high-risk. Confirmed threat detections, a brand-evoking wallet theme on a throwaway-style address, and the lack of any accountable identity all point in the same direction. The site's technical hygiene reflects only commodity platform defaults and carries no weight against these indicators.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through Vercel's platform on Amazon cloud infrastructure behind a content-delivery layer. All observed addresses are edge nodes, and the underlying origin is not visible. This is a mitigating factor only. Reputable shared hosting is freely available to any publisher, so it offers no assurance about the content served, and it can allow content to be swapped quickly without any change in the visible infrastructure.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, wallet connection, seed-phrase entry, or any financial interaction. At most it should be viewed passively, and only by users prepared to treat it as hostile. Anyone who has already interacted with it should act immediately to secure their assets and credentials, and report the address to the hosting platform and to the impersonated brand.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 85 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of click-to-transsfer.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on click-to-transsfer.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-15. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.3 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.11 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-15 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 18 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 85 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about click-to-transsfer.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.