Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
crimecat.vip shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 5 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20262 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
CRIMECAT is a very recently registered website whose homepage carries the title "CRIMECAT — Paired with Monero." It presents only a short block of text and appears to be a small, single-purpose landing page. The title suggests a theme tied to the Monero privacy cryptocurrency, but the captured content gives no reliable basis for confirming what product or service is offered, who operates it, or what business model it follows.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This is the decisive area of concern. Several independent external reputation sources currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, including a tier-one security vendor, and the combined detections amount to a confirmed blacklist listing. No conflicting legal identities or explicit brand impersonation were observed, because the site exposes no identity content to contradict. The risk therefore comes from the external threat detections. The domain's extreme youth strengthens it, and a young domain with a thin public footprint is the profile commonly used for short-lived abuse campaigns. Behavioural testing showed no wallet-drainer activity, no hidden forms, no external credential posts, and no cloaking. It did detect a clipboard-write operation on the page, which is a technique sometimes abused to swap copied payment addresses. No hijack was confirmed, but it is notable on a page themed around a cryptocurrency. These clean behavioural results do not offset the active blacklisting. Evidence:
- Homepage and domain reputation: multiple external sources report malicious and suspicious detections against the domain, with at least one tier-one vendor among them, and the domain is listed on an external blacklist.
- Domain registration: registered 2026-09-09 (~0.12 years, about six weeks old) through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, with the registrant details redacted for privacy.
- Web-archive depth: only 2 archive snapshots, spanning 2026-09-17 to 2026-09-22, which is consistent with a newly launched domain and no established history.
- Homepage behaviour: three automated visits succeeded with stable responses, three external data requests went only to recognised destinations, and one clipboard-write operation was detected without confirmed hijacking.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured homepage contains only about a thousand characters of text. No operating company, registration number, licensing statement, or legal-terms content was evident in it, so the site gives a visitor nothing to check against a registry. No third-party broker-reputation record matched the domain, so there is no independent regulatory or reputational record to weigh in either direction. The site's real-world operator has not been independently connected to any brand or person, and nothing on the page provides that link. The absence of disclosures does not itself establish wrongdoing. It does mean no regulatory standing can be assumed for a site that is also carrying active threat detections. Evidence:
- Homepage: very brief text content, with no entity name, licence, or registration reference visible.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 at domain-validation (DV) level, valid to 2026-12-08, which confirms an encrypted connection only and says nothing about the operator.
- Third-party broker data: no matching record found.
What to Verify Next
Before any engagement, the operator's identity should be established through an independent route unrelated to this site, such as a registry search for a named legal entity or a direct inquiry to a known, separately sourced contact channel. Any claim that the site is linked to the Monero ecosystem or to an established project should be checked against that project's own official channels. The domain's blacklist status should also be re-checked later: an updated clean result from several independent sources would be needed before the posture could reasonably change. If the domain is expected to belong to a known organisation, that organisation should be asked directly to confirm ownership. Evidence:
- Homepage: the title's Monero reference is the only identifying claim, and it is not corroborated by any other content.
- Domain reputation: current detections may change as the domain is reviewed, so a later re-check is meaningful.
- Domain registration: the six-week-old registration leaves no long-term track record to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is high-risk. Independent threat detections and a confirmed blacklist listing on a brand-new domain with no verifiable operator outweigh every neutral or positive technical signal. The evidence points to a site that has not earned trust and is actively flagged as hostile.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall, and all four observed addresses are edge addresses, so the origin server is not visible. The certificate is valid and the infrastructure is mainstream, which is a mild mitigating factor. However, edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content is hosted and can conceal rapid content changes, and protective infrastructure cannot offset the reputational findings. A young domain with few subdomains is a minor unconfirmed heuristic, not an established risk.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, or any payment or financial transaction. Nothing should be downloaded from it. If it must be viewed at all, that should be done in a read-only manner from an isolated browser, and any copied payment details should be checked in full before use.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE
05 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crimecat.vip.
- The request stayed on crimecat.vip. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-09. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-17. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3036::ac43:c2c5 |
| Name servers | jack.ns.cloudflare.com, cloe.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-08 |
| Domain age | 0.12 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-09 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-17 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crimecat.vip at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.