Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
proposal-flybrain.site shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20263 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The domain presents a single-page front end whose captured title reads "FindYourBroker.io", which suggests a broker-discovery or brokerage-comparison service. That title does not match the site's own hostname, which refers to a "proposal" and "flybrain". The homepage carried about two and a half thousand characters of text. It was captured successfully and answered normally, but no reliable product, company or business-model description could be recovered from it. Its apparent purpose is therefore to steer visitors toward financial brokers, and the operator behind it is unidentified.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present, and they are decisive. The domain is blacklisted by external threat-intelligence sources. Several independent security engines classify it as malicious or suspicious, including a tier-one vendor. The site is also treated as a known phishing candidate. No conflicting legal entities were found, and no brand impersonation or phishing content was confirmed on the page itself. The risk therefore rests on the external listings and on the site's very recent creation, which fits throwaway infrastructure. Behavioural testing adds corroborating context. Almost all network activity during the visit went to third-party destinations, and the great majority of it was not on any known-benign list. One of the few outbound POST requests went to a non-whitelisted external destination, which is a possible data-exfiltration path. The page also rebuilt itself heavily after interaction, so the content a visitor first sees may not be what the site ends up serving. The same testing found no wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, cloaking or external password forms. The risk is the unexplained third-party traffic combined with the external listings, not a demonstrated exploit. No contact address was published on the captured page. Evidence:
- Homepage: external reputation sources currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and a tier-one vendor is among them.
- Homepage behaviour: 2,826 external XHR/fetch requests across 3 runs, 98.9% of activity external, and 1 non-whitelisted external POST.
- Homepage behaviour: 1,526 DOM mutations after interaction, with no cloaking, hidden-form or wallet-drainer behaviour detected.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-15 (~0.1 years old), with 3 archive snapshots from 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-25 (1 year tracked).
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured page gave no clear legal-entity, licensing or registration disclosure. This is a transparency gap, not proof of wrongdoing, but here it compounds the external listings. A site that points visitors toward financial brokers would ordinarily show who operates it and under which authority. Ownership and governance are opaque, and the real-world operator could not be connected to any person or company. The domain is held through a commercial registrar, NiceNIC International Group Co., Limited. No third-party broker-reputation dataset matched the site, so no external reputational or regulatory context is available for it. The site's certificate and hosting identity are routine and do not establish who runs it. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence number or regulator reference was identified in the captured text.
- Domain registration: registered through NiceNIC International Group Co., Limited, created 2026-09-15 and expiring 2027-09-15.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by YE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-13.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction, the operator's claims should be tested independently. The site's own statements should not be relied on. If it names a broker or advisory firm, that firm's authorisation should be looked up directly in the relevant national financial-regulator register. Any contact or support channel should be confirmed through an independent route, such as a number or address published by the regulator or the firm's own established website. The domain's relationship to any legitimate broker-comparison brand should be checked by reaching that brand's official site, not by following links from this one. Re-checking the external reputation listings after some weeks would show whether they have been cleared or have grown. Evidence:
- Homepage: the page title names a broker-search brand that differs from the hostname, and no operator is stated.
- Domain age: the very recent creation date leaves no long operating history to rely on.
- Reputation: external listings are active at the time of analysis.
Summary Verdict
The site presents an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture. Externally confirmed adverse listings, a newly created domain with minimal history and an unidentified operator converge on the same conclusion. Neither a valid certificate nor an otherwise orderly page load offsets them. Legitimacy cannot be established on the available evidence, and the site is suitable for passive viewing at most.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge server. The origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently verified and content could be changed behind the edge without notice. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It reduces direct exposure of the origin, but it does not vouch for the operator, and it cannot offset the reputation findings. A sparse subdomain footprint on a newly registered domain was flagged only as an unconfirmed heuristic and carries little weight on its own.
Closing Assessment
Treat this site as read-only at most. Do not enter credentials, log in, connect any account or wallet, or submit personal or financial information. Do not download files from it. Anyone who has already interacted with it should change any reused passwords and monitor the accounts concerned. Engage with brokers only through channels confirmed independently.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of proposal-flybrain.site.
- The request stayed on proposal-flybrain.site. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-15. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-15. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3036::6815:557d |
| Name servers | ishaan.ns.cloudflare.com, tani.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-13 |
| Domain age | 0.10 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-15 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-15 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about proposal-flybrain.site at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.