Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
crypto-efk.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | The page is Netlify's default 'Site not found' 404 response, shown when the requested site or path does not exist. It contains no service description, forms, links, or claims. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20261 snapshot | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Overview
This website is a subdomain on Netlify's free hosting platform whose name suggests a cryptocurrency-related project. At the time of analysis it serves only the platform's default "Site not found" error page. That page has no branding, product description, navigation, contact details or stated claims, so no business model can be inferred. In its current state it is an empty hosting placeholder, not an operating service.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site shows contradictory signals of a serious kind. Several independent reputation engines classify it adversely: two rate it malicious and a third rates it suspicious. A separate external blacklist also lists it, so the site is blacklisted by third-party sources. No phishing or brand-impersonation finding was confirmed, and no conflicting legal identities appear. The page-analysis layer did flag a strong lookalike resemblance to the hosting platform's own domain. That resemblance comes largely from the subdomain structure, and it adds to the concern without proving impersonation. The most consequential behavioural finding is that the automated sandbox detected hidden forms, including password-type fields, in every one of its three runs. A page that displays nothing but a 404 notice should contain no credential-capable form structure, and the mismatch between what is shown and what is present is a classic pattern for kits that are staged before activation. The page also produced very large DOM changes after interaction and a heavy volume of external requests. All of these requests went to destinations the sandbox classified as benign, and no password form posted to an external destination. Two abuse reports exist against an address in the site's hosting range. They relate to shared provider infrastructure rather than to this site specifically, and they are discounted accordingly.
- Homepage: shows only the platform's default error text and an internal reference ID, with no operator content, links or claims.
- Homepage, sandbox behaviour: hidden password-bearing forms were present in all three runs, and DOM mutations after interaction were extremely high (about 4,130).
- Domain provenance: registered about 13 days before analysis (2026), a very new domain.
- Web archive: a single snapshot, captured 2026-10-07, so there is a one-year tracking window and no meaningful history.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site presents no legal, licensing or corporate-identity information. It has no terms page, no about page, and no registration or licence claim, so there is nothing to assess against a regulator. This is a disclosure gap on an empty placeholder, and on its own it is not evidence of fraud. The operator's identity cannot be independently connected to any real-world person or company, and ownership and governance remain opaque. This is an opacity condition, not an identity contradiction. No broker-reputation dataset matched the site. The valid certificate and the identified network provider show only that the platform is correctly configured. They say nothing about the site's operator.
- Served from AS16509 (Amazon, AMAZON-02, US).
- TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 at OV level, valid to 2027-03-19. The certificate subject is Netlify, Inc, not the site operator.
- Homepage: no company name, licence number, regulator reference or legal documentation is displayed.
What to Verify Next
Before the address is treated as anything other than hostile, it should be established who deployed it and why a credential-style form structure sits behind an error page. Anyone who received this address from a message, advertisement or social account should confirm the sender's authenticity through an independent route and should treat the link as unvetted. If an operator later claims to run a crypto service from this address, the official project site should be located independently, and any claimed licence should be checked directly with the relevant registry. Re-testing is also warranted once the site changes, because hidden form content and large DOM changes suggest the page may be rewritten after deployment.
- Homepage: the page directs site owners to the platform's support guide, so ownership questions belong with the hosting platform's abuse or support channels.
- Sandbox behaviour: 36 external network requests were observed, 15 of them background data requests, all to destinations the sandbox classified as benign.
- Reputation checks: adverse detections are current, so a later re-scan will show whether the listings have been cleared or the content has changed.
Summary Verdict
The site is assessed as high risk. Confirmed third-party blacklisting and concealed credential-capable form structures outweigh the technical hygiene of a correctly configured hosting platform. The evidence does not establish that a legitimate operator or service stands behind the address. The posture is firmly cautionary.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through Amazon-operated edge infrastructure with a valid certificate. All observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server is not observable. This is a mitigating factor only. Platform-level protection cannot offset the adverse reputation findings, and edge-only visibility limits independent verification of the hosting and allows content to be swapped quickly.
Closing Assessment
Interaction should be limited to read-only viewing, if the address is opened at all. No login, credentials, wallet connection or financial activity should be attempted through it. Any message, advertisement or referral that directed a user here should be treated as suspect and reported.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS
03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-efk.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on crypto-efk.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-efk.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.