Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
dexscreenervoteapp.com shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YE2 | Noted |
| Hosted by | BLNWXServer in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website presents itself as "DexScreener", the title shown on its single landing page, under a domain that joins that name to the words "vote app". The landing page carries only a short block of text. Its apparent purpose is to look like a companion or voting service tied to a well-known crypto market-analytics brand, a pattern typical of lookalike lures aimed at crypto users. The evidence does not show a product, a company or a service behind it.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Hard contradictions are present, and the assessment is high risk. Several independent security engines currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, including a tier-one security vendor, and the combined result amounts to a confirmed blacklist listing. The domain also embeds a prominent third-party brand name and the landing page repeats that name in its title. That combination is consistent with a brand-lookalike construction, even though no explicit phishing form or credential harvester was captured. The domain was registered only weeks ago, so there is no established history to offset the reputational findings. No conflicting legal entities appear, so there is no identity contradiction in the strict sense. The risk rests on the blacklist listing, the lookalike naming and the lack of any track record. In sandbox testing the page made no outbound data requests and showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or credential posts. This only means no active malicious behavior was triggered in three runs, and it does not offset the threat-intelligence listings. Pages on lookalike domains are often swapped for malicious content after launch. Evidence:
- Domain registered 2026-09-06 (~0.12 years, about 45 days old), registered through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED and set to expire 2027-09-06.
- The homepage title reads "DexScreener" while the domain is dexscreenervoteapp.com, and its text content is very brief.
- External reputation checks return two malicious and three suspicious verdicts, including one from a tier-one vendor, plus a confirmed blacklist listing.
- Three sandbox runs of the homepage returned HTTP 200 with no outbound requests, wallet prompts or form posts.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The homepage discloses no operating company, registered address, licensing status or regulatory registration. It also offers no legal or terms pages that could tie it to an accountable entity. The domain registration record does not name the owner either. This ownership opacity is an administrative limitation and does not by itself show wrongdoing. No third-party broker or regulatory record matches this site, and no external body vouches for it. Given the active blacklist listing, the missing disclosures remove any basis for treating the site as an accountable financial or analytics provider. The transport-encryption certificate is valid, but it is only a basic domain-validated one. It shows that the connection is encrypted and does not show who operates the site. Evidence:
- The homepage names no legal entity, license or registration number, and no terms or about page was captured.
- Served from AS399629 (BL Networks, US).
- TLS certificate issued by YE2 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-12-05 with 44 days remaining.
- The domain registration record gives no usable owner information.
What to Verify Next
The brand named on the page should be confirmed only through its own official channels, reached by typing the address manually or through a known bookmark. The question is whether that brand operates any "vote" application or any service on this domain. Any link, message or social post that directed a visitor here should be traced back to its sender. If it came from an unsolicited source, it should be treated as a lure and reported to the brand and to the hosting abuse desk. Anyone who already entered credentials, connected a wallet or approved any signature on this domain should revoke wallet permissions, change reused passwords and review recent account activity. Security teams should add the domain to monitoring and blocking lists, and re-test it later because the content may change. Evidence:
- The domain adds the words "vote app" to the brand name, which suggests an unofficial add-on the brand may never have issued.
- The domain is only weeks old, so any claim of an official relationship has no history behind it.
- The sandbox found no wallet or form behavior, but the blacklist listing remains current.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture. Active threat-intelligence listings, a brand-lookalike domain construction and a complete absence of verifiable provenance converge on the same conclusion. Neither the benign behavior observed in sandboxing nor the valid encryption certificate is enough to counter that.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind a mainstream CDN and web application firewall, and every observed address is an edge server, so the origin host could not be seen. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It also prevents independent confirmation of where the content is hosted, and it can conceal a rapid change of content. Two unconfirmed infrastructure observations are consistent with a newly established domain: a thin footprint and sparse subdomains. They carry little weight next to the reputation findings.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. At most it should be viewed read-only, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Organizations should block it at the web gateway and report it to the impersonated brand's security contact.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The hosting and network setup shows a moderate level of risk indicators.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_RISK_MED - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dexscreenervoteapp.com.
- The request stayed on dexscreenervoteapp.com. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-06. Noted
- It is hosted on BLNWX, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | BLNWX - BL Networks, US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.111.93.27 |
| Name servers | MELODY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, VICKY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 1 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-05 |
| Domain age | 0.12 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-06 |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dexscreenervoteapp.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.