Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
dexscreenervotes.com shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 9 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafeGoogle | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 2% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.4 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 20254 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YE2 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2025.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Google, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page site at a domain that combines the name of a well-known crypto market-analytics brand with the word "votes". It presents a short page, with very little text, titled "DexScreener". The page gives a visitor the impression of a community voting or engagement feature tied to that brand. Its apparent purpose cannot be independently tied to any verified operator or to the brand it names.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The evidence converges on an elevated, security-forward assessment. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious. A major browser-safety service has listed it under the social-engineering category, the class used for phishing and deceptive-lure pages. These confirmed blacklist hits are decisive and are not offset by the site's otherwise benign technical behaviour. The domain name borrows a recognised brand and the page title repeats it. That is consistent with the lure pattern behind the social-engineering listing, although the evidence does not independently establish who operates the site. The domain is also very young by registration. That is typical of throwaway lure infrastructure and gives no reputational track record to counterbalance the listings. Abuse reports have also been filed against the hosting address, and the most recent was very recent. Those reports attach to the shared hosting provider's address and not to the site specifically, so they are corroborating context only. In the automated browsing sessions the page showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden credential forms or content cloaking. This does not reduce the risk. A lure page can be dormant or can wait to be activated, and the blacklist status stands regardless. No conflicting legal identities were observed. Evidence:
- Homepage: the page title presents the site as "DexScreener" while the domain is a different, brand-derived name. The page carries only a small amount of text.
- Domain registration: created 2026-09-03 (~0.14 years, about 52 days old). Web-archive coverage is thin, with 4 snapshots spanning 2025–2026 (2 years tracked).
- Reputation: 9 engines rate the domain malicious and 1 suspicious. Three Tier-1 security vendors are among them, and the browser-safety listing is for social engineering.
- Hosting address: 4 abuse reports on the shared provider address, the latest about one day before analysis.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site discloses no verifiable legal entity, licence, registration number or governance information. Nothing on the captured page connects it to an accountable operator or to the brand whose name it uses. The registration record reflects incomplete or concealed ownership. This is an ownership-opacity issue, not an identity contradiction. It compounds the concern because the site also carries confirmed blacklist listings. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry matched the site, so no outside reputational signal supports or undermines it. The site's identity remains unverified. Its technical hygiene is basic: a valid but low-assurance transport certificate that expires soon, and a registrar that is a budget provider. Evidence:
- Registration record: registrar is NICENIC International Group Co., Limited; expires 2027-09-03.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-12-04 (39 days remaining). DV confirms only control of the domain, not the identity of its owner.
- Hosting: served from AS399629 (BLNWX – BL Networks, US).
- Homepage: no company name, licence reference or terms/about pages were present in the captured content.
What to Verify Next
No sensitive interaction should be started until the following checks are done. The brand named in the domain should be contacted through its officially published channels, to establish whether this domain is a sanctioned property. Those channels should be reached through a route independent of anything on this site. The listing status should be rechecked with the browser-safety service and the threat-intelligence engines before any reassessment. If the owner is a compromised victim, a documented clean-up and delisting would be the earliest credible sign of recovery. The hosting provider's abuse desk can be notified so the content is reviewed. Any official support or contact channels should be confirmed through a separate source and not through this page. Evidence:
- Homepage: the site presents no official-brand attribution that could be checked directly.
- Reputation: blacklist listings are active as of the analysis date (2026-10-25).
- Hosting: the provider operates a public abuse-reporting route, and abuse reports have already been filed against its address.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated risk posture. Confirmed blacklist listings, including a social-engineering classification, dominate the assessment. A brand-derived domain name, a very recent registration and an unverified operator reinforce that conclusion. The valid certificate and quiet sandbox behaviour do not change the decisive reputation evidence. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from the evidence available.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, which is a mitigating factor only. The single observed address is an edge address, and the origin server was not observable. This limits independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content changes. The domain's young age and sparse DNS footprint add heuristic, unconfirmed caution. Protective infrastructure does not offset the reputation risk.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. Non-interactive viewing, if needed at all, is the only appropriate use. Anyone who has already submitted credentials or connected a wallet here should treat those as exposed and rotate or revoke them without delay.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
03 Hosting and network
- The hosting and network setup shows a moderate level of risk indicators.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_RISK_MED - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN - The domain is young and has a very small footprint on the network.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_LOW_FOOTPRINT_YOUNG_DOMAIN - Several separate hosting and network checks came back negative.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_MULTIPLE_NEGATIVE_SIGNALS
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 64.111.93.27 (BL Networks, Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit), 2% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dexscreenervotes.com.
- The request stayed on dexscreenervotes.com. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-03. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2025-06-07. Clear
- It is hosted on BLNWX, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
|---|---|
| Hosting | BLNWX - BL Networks, US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.111.93.27 |
| Name servers | GRANT.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, MARJORY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 1 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-04 |
| Domain age | 1.38 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-03 |
| Archive first seen | 2025-06-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 2% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dexscreenervotes.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.