Is fomovotes-44.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Google flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page memecoin trading interface for a token called SPACEHOOD, presented as a launchpad-style platform with a "fomo votes" brand. It offers buy and sell controls funded by a cash deposit into a platform balance. It also shows a token leaderboard, a social "thesis" feed and per-trader profit-and-loss tables. The apparent business model is fee income from speculative token trading, with prominent gain displays encouraging further deposits.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is clearly cautionary, because the site carries confirmed external reputation contradictions. A major browser-safety service flags it for deceptive, social-engineering content. Several independent security engines, including two tier-one vendors, classify it as malicious or suspicious, so it is blacklisted by third-party sources. No conflicting legal identities or brand impersonation were observed, so the contradictions come from reputation rather than identity. The page content points the same way. The token page features leaderboard gains of +1,151%, +66,295% and more than +100,000%. A trader's note says "many of you will never hit a 100x. I will." Another note says "400k in fees sitting there", with no explanation of whose fees these are or where they go. The token entry reads "No description found", and the page gives no audit, team or custody information. Preset deposit buttons ($10, $100, $500, $1000) sit beside this evidence-free profit display. This is a deposit-before-service structure: funds go into a platform-held balance with no disclosed safeguards. The pattern fits a pump-and-deposit funnel, and it is consistent with the social-engineering classification. Evidence:

• Token trading page: leaderboard shows triple-digit-to-six-figure percentage gains, a "100x" boast and an unexplained "400k in fees" remark, with no supporting substantiation.
• Token trading page: SPACEHOOD has no description, audit or team information, yet the page takes cash deposits through $10–$1000 presets.
• Domain provenance: registered 2026 (~0.05 years, 17 days old); 2 archive snapshots spanning 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-11 (1 year tracked), so no established history.
• Reputation checks: 3 engines report the site as malicious and 1 as suspicious; a browser-safety service flags it for social engineering.

Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal entity, operator name, team, licence, registration number or terms of service appears on the page. The identity of the party that holds deposited funds therefore cannot be tied to any real-world person or company, and the site's ownership and governance remain opaque. A platform that custodies user cash and facilitates token trading would be expected to disclose a regulated operator and its custody arrangements. This absence is a verification gap in its own right, and here it compounds the reputation contradictions above. The site runs on a free hosting-platform subdomain, so it has no standalone branded domain that would give it a separate identity. No third-party broker or regulatory record matched this site, so no external regulatory standing can be attributed to it. Evidence:

• Token trading page: no company name, jurisdiction, licence, registration number or custody statement is shown.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US) on a platform-provided subdomain rather than a dedicated domain.
• Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE1 (domain-validated only, valid to 2026-12-31, 72 days remaining), which confirms encryption and nothing about who operates the site.

What to Verify Next

Any engagement should start by establishing independently who operates the platform and who legally holds deposited funds. That means searching the financial-services registers of the relevant jurisdictions for a matching licensed entity, rather than relying on anything the page says. The SPACEHOOD token contract and the other listed tokens should be examined on a public blockchain explorer, covering holder concentration, liquidity lock status and any audit. The platform's official channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route and not through links on this page. The leaderboard gains and the fee figure should be treated as unverified until matched against on-chain records. Evidence:

• Token trading page: eleven named tokens are listed with market-cap and percentage-gain figures that cannot be reconciled with any disclosed data source.
• Token trading page: the deposit and trade controls give no indication of where funds are held or how withdrawals work.
• Reputation checks: the active third-party flags should be re-checked for delisting before any reassessment.

Summary Verdict

The site is assessed as high-risk and untrusted. Third-party security detections, a deposit-led speculative trading model and an unidentifiable operator reinforce each other. The few positive technical hygiene signals do not offset the reputation findings, and no evidence supports treating the site as legitimate.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is an edge server, so the origin host cannot be independently identified. A valid certificate and reputable network infrastructure are mitigating technical hygiene only. They do not establish legitimacy, and they do not offset the external threat detections. Edge-only visibility also means the content behind the edge could be changed quickly without any visible change in hosting.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. No deposits, funds transfers, wallet connections or credential entry should be made. Anyone who has already deposited funds should contact their payment provider and the relevant consumer-protection or financial regulator promptly.