Is list-votesokx.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 20/100

Overview

This website is a single-page "Token Voting" service titled "Vote on Crypto Listings". It invites visitors to vote on which crypto tokens should be listed, which is a community-engagement pitch aimed at crypto audiences. It runs on a free, shared hosting subdomain rather than a dedicated domain, and its short homepage presents no recognizable operating brand. Its apparent purpose is to draw crypto-interested visitors into a voting interaction.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries an elevated risk. It is blacklisted by external threat-intelligence sources, and several independent detection engines flag it as malicious or suspicious. That is a confirmed contradiction and the decisive factor in this assessment. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation or page-level phishing artifacts were observed, so the concern comes from reputation listings rather than from on-page content. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site, or content cloaking. Even so, the homepage made several data submissions (POST requests) to external, non-allow-listed destinations in every test run. A "vote on listings" mechanic is a common lure for crypto audiences, and these off-site submissions mean data entered or generated on the page may leave the site's own control. The throwaway hosting address and the listing-vote theme together fit a high-risk archetype, so the listings should be treated as credible until delisted. Evidence:

• Homepage reputation: external threat-intelligence checks returned two malicious and two suspicious detections, and the domain also appears on an external blacklist.
• Homepage behaviour: three external POST requests to non-allow-listed destinations occurred across three successful test runs, with roughly 39% of observed requests going to third-party hosts.
• Homepage behaviour: no wallet-provider interaction, clipboard writes, hidden forms or suspicious inline scripts were detected.
• Homepage content: the page is titled "Token Voting | Vote on Crypto Listings" and carries no named operator.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured content shows no licence, registration number or named legal entity. For a site inviting crypto-related participation, this is a verification gap rather than evidence of wrongdoing on its own. The operator's real-world identity is not independently established, so no claim of legitimacy can be sustained. Registration details for the domain are incomplete, which is an ownership-opacity limitation rather than an identity contradiction. No match was found in the third-party broker reputation dataset, so no external regulatory or reputational context is available either way. The site's transport encryption is valid, but a domain-validated certificate only proves control of the hostname, not the legitimacy of its operator. Evidence:

• Homepage: no licensing, registration or company disclosure is present in the captured content.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), which says nothing about who operates the site.
• Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only) and is valid to 2026-12-31, with 65 days remaining.
• Third-party broker dataset: no match.

What to Verify Next

Any project that this voting page claims to represent or serve should be asked directly, through its officially published channels and not through links on this site. The questions are whether the project operates the voting page and whether it has ever run a token-listing vote. Anyone who still wants to assess the site should wait for the external detections to be cleared, or re-checked against several independent reputation services, before treating the listings as resolved. Any claimed licence, registration or operating company should be confirmed in the relevant public registry, and a name appearing only on this site should not be relied on. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

• Homepage: the voting mechanic and listing claims are not tied to any identifiable project or entity.
• Reputation: the current malicious and suspicious detections are the main item to re-check for delisting.
• Registry check: no licence or registration reference exists in the captured content to check against.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed adverse reputation listings outweigh the benign technical hygiene and the clean behavioural tests. The operator's identity is not established, and the evidence gives no basis for treating the site as legitimate.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge nodes, so the origin server was not observable. Infrastructure of this kind is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputation risk, and the edge-only view prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content changes. The certificate is valid and issued by a recognized authority, and the hosting network is a mainstream provider with no abuse reports against its address.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. No wallet should be connected and no transaction signed. No credentials or personal data should be submitted, and no payment or token interaction should occur until the external listings are cleared and an official project confirms its involvement.