Is loyalty-buttcoin.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page cryptocurrency promotion titled "BUTTCOIN – The Original Memecoin Since 2011". Its domain name pairs a "loyalty" label with the coin name. It presents itself to visitors as the home of a long-running memecoin, and its apparent purpose is to promote the token and attract participation in a token-based offering.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and are serious. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and a confirmed blacklist listing exists, so the site must be treated as blacklisted rather than merely poorly reputed. A tier-one security vendor is among the flagging sources. No conflicting legal entities, brand-impersonation match or confirmed phishing-page capture was recorded. The listings alone are decisive, and no infrastructure or encryption feature offsets them. The homepage's headline claim of being "the original memecoin since 2011" is an unverifiable superlative. It also sits badly with a domain that was registered only weeks before analysis, so the claimed heritage cannot be attributed to this domain. Browser behaviour during the sandbox runs adds to the concern. The page generated heavy third-party traffic, almost entirely to external destinations, including several data submissions (POST requests) to external hosts outside the expected set of services. No wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, cloaking or fingerprinting were observed. The external submissions still warrant treating any data entered on the page as exposed to unidentified third parties. Evidence:

• Homepage: the title claims a memecoin history "since 2011", yet the domain was registered on 2026-08-18 (about 0.19 years, roughly 68 days old).
• Reputation: several engines rate the domain malicious or suspicious, and a blacklist listing is confirmed.
• Homepage behaviour: three sandbox runs recorded external requests on a large majority of page activity, including five external POST submissions to non-whitelisted destinations.
• Homepage behaviour: four console errors were logged, with no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack or hidden-form activity.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured homepage did not allow its identity and disclosure content to be assessed. No licence, corporate registration or named operating entity could be established from the evidence, and the real-world operator has not been independently connected to the site. Public registration data is also incomplete on ownership, which is a limitation on traceability rather than a contradiction. This is a verification gap and not evidence of wrongdoing in its own right. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputational record matched the site. The assessment therefore rests on the threat listings described above, not on regulatory findings. Technical hygiene is present but weak as an offset. The site holds a currently valid domain-validated certificate, which proves only that the connection is encrypted and says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence:

• Domain registration: created 2026-08-18 and set to expire 2027-08-18, through the registrar NICENIC International Group Co., Limited, with incomplete owner details.
• Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2027-01-15.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
• Homepage: no identifiable legal entity, licence or registration number was extracted.

What to Verify Next

Any engagement with the site should start by treating it as unsafe for sensitive actions until the threat listings are cleared. The security listings should be re-checked directly with the listing sources. Any claim of an official token, project or community should be confirmed through channels independent of this domain. A published chain contract address should be matched against a block explorer, and any claimed team or foundation should be confirmed through independent public records. Because the domain is very new, an older domain with a genuine history should be identified before the "since 2011" claim is credited. Evidence:

• Homepage: the "original since 2011" claim has no corroboration in the evidence collected.
• Reputation: the confirmed blacklist and the multi-engine detections remain current as of this analysis.
• Domain: its recent registration conflicts with the project-age claim made on the page.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is critical and clearly cautionary. Confirmed external threat detections, a very young domain and heavy outbound data traffic converge on a high-risk assessment. Protective technical features do not change that conclusion, and the evidence does not support treating the site as trustworthy.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. Every observed address is a CDN edge server, and the origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be verified independently. That edge-only visibility can also mask rapid content changes. Together with a young domain with few subdomains, this is an unconfirmed heuristic and does not establish wrongdoing. The protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only and cannot offset the reputation risk.

Closing Assessment

At most, the site should be viewed read-only. No account login, credential entry, wallet connection, token purchase or other financial interaction should take place, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Anyone who has already submitted data there should treat it as exposed and rotate any affected credentials.