Is memes-airdrop.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

memes-airdrop.netlify.app
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

memes-airdrop.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

What this site appears to beGeneric Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error page with no site content, forms, links, or offers. No deceptive or sensitive-data elements are present, and the page cannot be assessed as a service.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware enginesNone flagged itVirusTotalClear
Google Safe BrowsingListed as unsafeGoogleRisk
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age11 days oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 20262 snapshotsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1Noted

The page as captured

https://memes-airdrop.netlify.app/
Screenshot of the memes-airdrop.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What memes-airdrop.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Overview

This website is a subdomain on the Netlify shared hosting platform. When visited, it shows only the platform's generic "Site not found" error screen. The screen has no branding, products, pricing, navigation, forms or contact details. No service or business model can be observed. The hostname, which combines "memes" and "airdrop", resembles the naming used for token-giveaway campaigns. The page content itself does not confirm that purpose.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present. A major browser-security threat listing currently flags the address for social engineering, and a further external listing independently corroborates it, so the site is blacklisted. This is the decisive factor, and the clean-looking error page does not offset it. The visible page is inert, but behavioural testing found hidden form elements, including password-type fields, in every one of three test runs. It also found an unusually large volume of page changes after interaction. A genuine hosting error screen should show neither. This suggests the served content differs from what the static screen displays, or can be swapped in. The page was also flagged for lexical similarity to the hosting platform's own domain. That signal is a heuristic: the visible content is the platform's genuine default screen, and no confirmed impersonation or conflicting legal identities were found. Two abuse reports exist, but they attach to a shared cloud-provider address rather than to this site, and they are discounted.

Evidence
  • Homepage: shows only the platform's default "Site not found" message, with no content, links or offers.
  • Behavioural analysis of the homepage: hidden forms with password fields detected in all three runs, plus very heavy page mutation after interaction.
  • Threat-intelligence listings: the site is flagged for social engineering. The browser-security listing and the second external blacklist match.
  • Domain provenance: only about 11 days of observable history (first seen 9 October 2026). The web archive holds 2 snapshots across a 1-year span, which is a very new and thin footprint.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no legal, identity or policy pages. It names no operator, company, registration number, licence or regulator, and it publishes no terms, privacy statement or contact channel. Operator identity is therefore unverified, and ownership cannot be established from the site. The absence of licensing information is a verification gap rather than evidence of wrongdoing, but the confirmed threat listing means it cannot be treated as a neutral omission. The valid certificate does not attest to the operator. Its organisation field names the hosting platform, not the site owner. No third-party reputational or broker record was found for this site.

Evidence
  • Homepage: no operator name, licence, registration number or regulator reference is published.
  • Transport security: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the platform, not the site operator.
  • Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).

What to Verify Next

Because a confirmed threat listing is active, verification should come before any engagement. If the site was reached through a message, social post or advert promising tokens or giveaways, trace the original source and confirm independently that the project exists on its officially published channels. Check whether the site operator has published any licence or registration with the relevant registry. Any official contact route should be found offline or through a project's established channels, not through this address.

Evidence
  • Homepage: no operator or project is named, so there is nothing on-site to cross-check.
  • Threat listing: the active social-engineering flag should be re-checked against current reputation services before any reconsideration.
  • Referral path: the hostname's airdrop-style naming makes the originating link the most informative artefact to examine.

Summary Verdict

The site is high-risk. Independent threat intelligence flags it for social engineering, its operator is unidentified, and its observed behaviour is inconsistent with the inert page it displays. Technical hygiene such as a valid certificate does not change this posture, and no legitimacy can be inferred from the available evidence.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served from addresses belonging to a major cloud provider's edge network, behind a recognised CDN/WAF layer. All observed addresses are edge nodes, and the origin server could not be independently observed. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only, and it cannot offset the confirmed external reputation risk.

Closing Assessment

Read-only observation from an isolated environment is the only reasonable interaction. Logging in, entering credentials or passwords, connecting a wallet, approving transactions, making payments and downloading files should all be avoided. If the address arrived through an unsolicited message or advert, it should be reported to the platform or channel where it appeared.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

01 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

02 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS

03 Hosting and network

  • The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D

04 History in the web archive

  • The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE

05 Page content

  • The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence50%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of memes-airdrop.netlify.app.

  • The request stayed on memes-airdrop.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-09. Clear
  • It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNot available
HostingAMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2a05:d014:58f:6200::259
Name serversNot available
CDN / edge networkDetected (aws)
Resolved IP addresses4
Edge IP addresses4
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerDigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
SSL expiry2027-03-19
Domain age0.03 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiryNot available
Archive first seen2026-10-09
Archive snapshots2
ReputationVirusTotal: 0 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 1 match

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about memes-airdrop.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about memes-airdrop.netlify.app

Is memes-airdrop.netlify.app a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of memes-airdrop.netlify.app found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-20, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is memes-airdrop.netlify.app safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of memes-airdrop.netlify.app?

memes-airdrop.netlify.app scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-20, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-20 · how we assess · report a mistake