Is packscan.cc a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

packscan.cc
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

packscan.cc shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

What this site appears to bePackScan presents itself as an AI crypto portfolio tracker that asks users to connect a Solana or EVM wallet for token risk scans and profit-opportunity insights. The page embeds a fake 'Verified by X' and Backpack account-linking flow and a wallet approval prompt for an unspecified amount, with unverifiable performance claims and no verifiable legal or contact identity.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines5 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host2% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 6 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain age22 days oldMost scam domains are under a year oldRisk
Web archiveArchived since 202612927 snapshotsClear
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by YR2Noted

The page as captured

https://packscan.cc/
Screenshot of the packscan.cc homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What packscan.cc served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
  • Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

PackScan is a newly launched website presenting itself as an AI-driven crypto portfolio tracker. It invites visitors to connect a Solana or EVM wallet so it can scan token holdings, score risk, and surface supposed "profit opportunities" and "paperhanded" coins. Its apparent business model is a funnel in which a few free scans lead to implied paid trading insights, with pricing and monetization left undefined.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The evidence converges on a clearly elevated risk. Two major security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious, and further engines rate it suspicious, which amounts to a confirmed blacklist presence on third-party threat listings. This is reinforced by page-level behavior. On load, the homepage plays a staged "Verified by X" sequence that claims a user's X account has been "verified and linked to BackPack". It also shows a Backpack badge with a large follower count, so the site borrows the identity of an established wallet brand. No genuine account linkage can occur, because the page contains no login or authorization form. Next to this sits a wallet approval prompt worded "Approve to scan any amount", an open-ended permission request that is inconsistent with the same page's assurances of "No wallet signature required" and "No funds access". The site also labels itself "Site is secure", "Official website" and "No threats detected". These are self-issued attestations with no independent backing, and they are contradicted by external detections. The performance and scale claims cannot be substantiated. They include "7.7x upside", "18.75 SOL" of "missed profit", "250K+ wallets analyzed", "$2.5B+ portfolio value" and "1000+ tokens tracked". A testimonials section titled "Real traders, real results" supplies no attributable users. The page also showcases memecoins (TROLL, PIPPIN, ALCH, VANK, WOLF, CHILL), which suits a lure built on missed-gains narratives. These traits match the pattern of wallet-draining and approval-phishing lures. Sandbox runs did not observe an actual drain or clipboard hijack, so this is a pattern-based assessment and not an observed theft. The decisive factor is that the combination of a fake verification flow, an unbounded approval request, and active threat listings points to deceptive intent. Evidence:

  • Homepage: a fake "Verified by X" and Backpack account-linking sequence, with a "Verification complete" message and a Backpack follower badge, and no real authentication form present.
  • Homepage: wallet prompt reading "Approve to scan any amount", alongside claims of "No wallet signature required" and "No funds access".
  • Homepage: unverifiable statistics (7.7x upside, 18.75 SOL missed profit, 250K+ wallets, $2.5B+ portfolio value) and self-declared "Official website" and "Site is secure" badges.
  • Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-28 (~0.06 years, about three weeks old), with 12,927 archive snapshots all within 2026 (first seen 2026-10-05, last seen 2026-10-16, 1 year tracked), so this volume of captures reflects a brand-new domain and not an established history.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site discloses no legal entity, registered address, licensing authority, or registration number. It also gives no verifiable contact route and no published terms of service or privacy terms. It promotes crypto trading insights and wallet analysis, which are activities that ordinarily call for clear operator identification. Pricing for the paid tier after the free scans is likewise never stated. These omissions are content gaps on the site's own pages. They are treated here as verification deficiencies and not as proof of fraud, and the confirmed threat listings noted above are what drive the cautionary posture. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found for the brand. The operator's real-world identity could not be independently connected to the site. Evidence:

  • Homepage: no company name, address, license, or legal terms are published, and the only visible social presences are generic links to Twitter, Discord and Telegram.
  • Site hosting: served from AS174 (COGENT-174, Cogent Communications) on a single IPv4 address registered in the ARIN region, geolocated to Canada.
  • Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR2 with domain-validation (DV) only, valid to 2027-01-05, which confirms encryption but no organizational vetting.
  • Registration: domain registered through Namecheap with a privacy service masking registrant details, which is an administrative detail in itself.

What to Verify Next

Any consideration of this service should begin outside the site itself. The claimed link between PackScan and Backpack should be checked by contacting Backpack through its own official channels, since the on-page "verified account" flow cannot be relied on. The operator's legal identity should be sought through business-registry and financial-regulator searches in the jurisdictions that matter to the user, and the official support channels should be confirmed independently. Anyone who has already connected a wallet should review and revoke token approvals using a trusted allowance-checking tool and treat that wallet's exposure as potentially compromised. Evidence:

  • Homepage: the Backpack verification flow and the follower badge are the claims to be confirmed with the brand directly.
  • Homepage: the wallet-connection step and the "any amount" approval wording are the actions to check for lingering permissions.
  • Threat listings: the current malicious flags from external security vendors should be rechecked on public reputation databases before any engagement.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Active third-party threat detections, staged verification theater, and an open-ended wallet permission request outweigh the site's polished presentation and technically valid encryption. The domain is also brand new and has no verifiable operator behind it. Available evidence is consistent with a deceptive wallet-connection lure and not a legitimate analytics service.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site resolves to a single, directly exposed address, with no CDN or web-application firewall in front of it and no protective layer to mitigate that exposure. That address sits on shared provider infrastructure, and several abuse reports have been filed against it. Those reports concern the shared address and cannot be attributed to this site alone, and they were not discounted in the assessment. Heuristics also note a very young domain with a sparse subdomain footprint and fragmented infrastructure. These are unconfirmed indicators that add to the picture without being decisive.

Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for any wallet connection, approval signing, credential entry, or payment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should revoke wallet permissions and move assets to a fresh wallet. Browsing the page without interacting is the only low-risk use.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, several checks together.

01 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

02 Page content

  • The review of the page content rated it high risk.Page content rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH
  • The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator.Page content rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW
  • The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG

03 Several checks together

  • Several independent checks pointed to risk at the same time.Several checks together rule:HYB_MULTIPLE_MODULES_HIGH_RISK

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 170.75.160.175 (Lunanode Hosting Inc., Fixed Line ISP), 2% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score55/100
Identity verification confidence30%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of packscan.cc.

  • The request stayed on packscan.cc. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. Clear
  • DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
  • The registration is paid up to 2027-09-28. Noted
  • The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-05. Clear
  • It is hosted on COGENT-174, from a server in CA. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNAMECHEAP INC
HostingCOGENT-174 - Cogent Communications, LLC, US
CountryCA
Server IP170.75.160.175
Name serversDNS1.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM, DNS2.REGISTRAR-SERVERS.COM
CDN / edge networkNot detected
Resolved IP addresses1
Edge IP addresses0
Likely origin IP addresses1
SSL issuerYR2
SSL expiry2027-01-05
Domain age0.06 years (continuous registration)
Domain expiry2027-09-28
Archive first seen2026-10-05
Archive snapshots12927
ReputationVirusTotal: 5 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 2% confidence, 6 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about packscan.cc at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about packscan.cc

Is packscan.cc a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of packscan.cc found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-20, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is packscan.cc safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of packscan.cc?

packscan.cc scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-20, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-20 · how we assess · report a mistake