Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
claimed.cash shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 11 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 2% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 6 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 1 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20263 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website presents a single landing page titled "Airdrop Access — Official Campaign Bridge" on a ".cash" domain whose name implies claiming tokens or funds. Its apparent purpose is to steer visitors into an airdrop-claim flow, a format commonly used for token-distribution campaigns and, in the abusive variant, for credential or wallet capture. The captured homepage is a short, text-based page that calls itself an official campaign. It names no verifiable brand, project, or operator.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
This is a confirmed adverse reputation case. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious, including two tier-one security vendors, and the domain is on a confirmed blacklist. Together with the "official campaign" framing and an airdrop-claim lure, this fits the profile of a campaign-bridge page used to harvest wallet access or credentials. The page claims official status but ties itself to no identifiable project. That claim is unsubstantiated and should be treated as a lure. The domain was registered only weeks before the assessment, and the web archive shows only a few captures over a very short window. Nothing indicates a legitimate prior use that was later repurposed. Automated browsing of the page found no external network calls, no wallet-connection attempts, no clipboard manipulation, and no cloaking. This reduces the likelihood of active on-page drainer code at the time of testing. It does not offset the independent detections, and the page could change its behavior later. The hosting IP also carries abuse reports. These stem from shared hosting infrastructure and are not attributable to this site alone, but they are not discounted. No conflicting legal identities were observed, and no brand impersonation was explicitly confirmed. Evidence:
- Homepage: titled "Airdrop Access — Official Campaign Bridge", with no named project, issuer, or operator.
- Reputation: 11 malicious and 2 suspicious detections, flagged by tier-one vendors Fortinet and Kaspersky; the domain is on a confirmed external blacklist.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-17 (~0.1 years, about 35 days old); 3 archive snapshots from 2026-09-17 to 2026-09-25 (1 year tracked).
- Hosting IP 170.75.160.175: 6 abuse reports, last reported 2026-10-16, attributed to shared provider infrastructure.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured content gives no way to tie the site to a regulated entity, licensed issuer, or registered legal operator. It states no company name, jurisdiction, registration number, or licence on its homepage. The operator's identity is not independently established. Because the site invites users to claim assets under an "official" banner, this absence matters more than it would for a purely informational page. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the domain, so there is no reputational context from that source either way. The domain is held through a mainstream registrar, and the TLS certificate is a basic domain-validated one. Both are administrative facts that confirm the domain exists and encrypts traffic. They say nothing about who operates it or whether the campaign is genuine. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence, registry reference, or jurisdiction disclosed.
- Domain registered through NameCheap, Inc.; registration runs to 2027-09-17.
- Served from AS174 (COGENT-174, Cogent Communications, LLC, US), hosted under the LN01 provider label, with the IP geolocated to Canada.
- TLS certificate issued by YR1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-15, with 54 days remaining.
What to Verify Next
Any claim of an official campaign should be checked against the announcing project's own channels, reached independently of this site. That means a known official website, verified social accounts, or a published announcement. If no such airdrop is announced there, the page should be treated as unauthorized. Reaching the page through an unsolicited message, advertisement, or social post is itself a reason to discard the link. Any official support or contact route should be confirmed the same way rather than through details on this page. Organizations should also consider blocking the domain at the network or email-filter level while the detections stand, and reporting it to the registrar and hosting provider's abuse desks. Evidence:
- Homepage: the only content is the self-described campaign bridge, so any claim has to be confirmed externally.
- No project or brand reference is present that can be matched to a known official source.
- Domain and hosting: registrar and hosting provider abuse channels exist for takedown reporting.
Summary Verdict
Available evidence supports a high-risk posture. Independent, convergent threat detections, a newly created domain with minimal history, and an unverifiable "official" airdrop framing outweigh the clean behavior observed during testing. The site's legitimacy is not established, and its operator remains unidentified.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site resolves to a single IP address on shared provider infrastructure, directly exposed. No CDN or WAF layer was detected, so there is no protective buffer. The certificate is valid, but that only encrypts traffic. An unconfirmed heuristic suggested infrastructure fragmentation; it carries little weight against the established verdict.
Closing Assessment
The site should not be used for login, wallet connection, credential entry, or any financial interaction. If already visited, any wallet approvals or credentials entered should be reviewed and revoked promptly. Further engagement should be limited to passive observation in an isolated environment, such as for security research.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 6 reports on hosting IP 170.75.160.175 (Lunanode Hosting Inc., Fixed Line ISP), 2% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of claimed.cash.
- The request stayed on claimed.cash. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NameCheap, Inc.. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by registrar-servers.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-17. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-17. Clear
- It is hosted on COGENT-174, from a server in CA. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NameCheap, Inc. |
|---|---|
| Hosting | COGENT-174 - Cogent Communications, LLC, US |
| Country | CA |
| Server IP | 170.75.160.175 |
| Name servers | dns1.registrar-servers.com, dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| CDN / edge network | Not detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 1 |
| Edge IP addresses | 0 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 1 |
| SSL issuer | YR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-15 |
| Domain age | 0.10 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-17 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-17 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 2% confidence, 6 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about claimed.cash at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.