Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Generic Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error page with no service content, forms, links, or claims. The underlying site's purpose cannot be determined from this capture. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 5 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The site is a user-created subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform. When captured, it showed only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 page, which has no products, services, forms, links, or claims. The subdomain name suggests a "portal", but the capture shows no business model, so the operator's purpose cannot be established from what the site presents.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Confirmed contradictions are present, so this section is cautionary. Several independent security engines currently flag the address as malicious, and one of them is a tier-one antivirus vendor. This is a confirmed blacklist-level detection that infrastructure protections cannot offset. The visible content also conflicts with the behavioral findings. The page looks like an inert hosting error, yet in all three sandbox runs it carried hidden forms that included password fields, and its page structure changed heavily after interaction. A genuine 404 placeholder would not normally contain concealed credential-capture surfaces. The page also closely mimics the hosting platform's own error screen, and the domain name is a near lookalike of that platform's domain. This points to a possible staged or cloaked lure rather than an abandoned site. The content analysis itself did not confirm impersonation or phishing, so these indicators are signals of concern, not a final attribution. Four abuse reports exist against a shared hosting address used by this site. They apply to the provider's shared address and not necessarily to this site, so they are treated as secondary context. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: a generic Netlify "Site not found" page of about 370 characters, with no title, meta description, links, or visible forms.
- Behavioral sandbox: hidden forms with password fields were detected in 3 of 3 runs, with more than 4,000 DOM mutations after interaction.
- Reputation checks: 5 malicious detections at the domain level, including a tier-one vendor, and a confirmed blacklist hit.
- Abuse reports: 4 reports against the shared edge address 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258, attributed to shared infrastructure.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured page contains no legal, about, terms, privacy, or contact content. It names no operating entity, lists no licence or registration number, and makes no regulated-activity claims. No identity contradiction exists, since no competing legal-entity names appear. However, the real-world operator also cannot be tied to any known brand or person, and no on-site disclosure can substitute for that. These are disclosure gaps and are not by themselves evidence of wrongdoing. They carry weight here only because they coincide with the threat detections above. No third-party broker or regulator record matched this domain, and that absence is neutral. The valid certificate and mainstream hosting show the site is technically reachable and encrypted. They do not establish who runs it or whether it is legitimate. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: no entity name, licence, registration number, or policy pages are present.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1, OV-validated, subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Third-party broker dataset: no match for this domain.
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction, the subdomain's owner should be identified through the hosting platform's own abuse or support channel, since the site gives no operator information. Anyone who reached this address through a message, advertisement, or QR code should trace that source and confirm independently, through an official channel, whether the organisation actually uses this address. Any organisation named as the source of the link should be asked directly, by a route not provided through the link, whether the address is theirs. If the link claimed to be a login or onboarding portal, the genuine portal address should be obtained from the organisation's official website or documentation. Any licence or registration claims made in related communications should be checked with the relevant registry. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: no operator or contact details are available to confirm.
- Behavioral sandbox: the hidden password forms mean the destination of any submitted data is unknown.
- Hosting: the subdomain sits on a shared multi-tenant platform, so ownership can be established only through that provider.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated risk posture. Confirmed adverse threat detections, together with concealed credential-capture behavior behind a blank-looking page, outweigh the neutral signals of encryption and mainstream hosting. Available evidence does not support treating the address as a legitimate or verified destination.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served through AWS edge infrastructure with a valid, OV-validated certificate, and no origin server address was observable. Protective infrastructure like this only mitigates exposure and does not offset the reputational findings. The edge-only visibility also makes it harder to confirm independently what is hosted and allows content to be changed quickly.
Closing Assessment
The address should be limited to passive, read-only observation at most. No credentials, personal data, or payments should be entered, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Organisations should consider blocking it and reporting it to the hosting provider.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-2zp.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.