Verdict
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
portal-moonshot-gcg.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.
| What this site appears to be | This is the Netlify default 'Site not found' 404 page. The requested path does not exist on the hosting platform, so the page offers no service, content, or forms. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 3 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This hostname is a subdomain on a shared static-site hosting platform. Its homepage shows only the platform's generic "Site not found" error page, which says the requested path does not exist. The page has no products, pricing, branding, legal text, calls to action or visible forms, so it has no observable business model or stated purpose. The name suggests a "portal" for a project called "moonshot", but nothing on the page supports or explains that.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present. External reputation sources currently flag the hostname as malicious, and a tier-one security vendor is among those flagging it, so the site is blacklisted by third-party sources. That is a decisive reason to treat it cautiously. No conflicting legal identities were found, and there is no confirmed phishing or impersonation finding. The hostname closely resembles the hosting platform's own domain, and the page reproduces that platform's error text. This is a lookalike indicator that is not confirmed as impersonation, but it fits a placeholder that could be repurposed. The visible content is harmless, but automated browsing sessions detected hidden form elements, including password-type fields, in every run. The page also changed heavily after interaction, which a static error page should not do. Content that swaps in after load can hide a credential-collection interface from a quick manual look. Two abuse reports exist against a network address used by this site. That address belongs to a shared cloud content-delivery range, and the reports are discounted as reflecting other tenants rather than this site. The site's own confirmed negative evidence is therefore the blacklisting, the hidden form behaviour and the lookalike hostname. Evidence:
- Homepage: the visible text is only the hosting platform's "Site not found" notice, with no title, description or offer.
- Homepage behaviour: hidden forms with password fields were detected in all three automated sessions, alongside large post-interaction page changes.
- Homepage behaviour: external requests were all to allow-listed destinations. No wallet connection, clipboard manipulation or fingerprinting was observed.
- Reputation checks: three engines rated the hostname malicious and one suspicious, including one tier-one vendor. Both abuse reports relate to the shared hosting address, not to the site itself.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site presents no legal, corporate or licensing information. It has no terms, privacy statement, about page or contact page, and no licence or registration number is claimed. Because no content exists, this is not by itself evidence of wrongdoing. It does mean no operator can be linked to the hostname, so the real-world owner is unidentified. Identity is unverified and ownership is opaque. No broker-database reputation record was matched. Technical hygiene is sound but does not offset the reputation findings. The certificate is organisation-validated, issued to the hosting platform rather than to any site operator, so it confirms the platform's identity only. Evidence:
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-level, issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), registered with ARIN.
- Site content: no legal entity, address, licence or registration number appears anywhere on the site.
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction, confirm independently who operates this hostname. Obtain the address directly from a known, trusted source, such as the organisation's official website or a representative reached through an independently sourced contact route, rather than from any message that supplied this link. If an organisation claims this portal, ask it to confirm the hostname in writing through its established channels. If the portal is said to relate to a financial or investment service, check the operator against the relevant regulator's public register. Anyone who received this link unsolicited should treat it as unconfirmed. Evidence:
- Homepage: it is the hosting platform's default error page, so no claim on the site can be checked against anything.
- Hostname: the words "portal" and "moonshot" imply a project or login destination, but no organisation is named.
- Behaviour: the hidden password fields seen in testing mean the page may present a login interface to some visitors.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is high-risk. The decisive concern is the external reputation findings, which are reinforced by hidden form behaviour that does not match the page's visible content. The absence of any identifiable operator leaves nothing to counterbalance them. Sound encryption and mainstream hosting establish only that the platform is technically competent, not that this site's purpose is legitimate.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through Amazon-operated CDN and edge infrastructure. All four observed addresses are edge servers in the same provider range, and the origin server is not visible. This is a mitigating factor, because the platform is a recognised provider with a valid certificate. It cannot offset the reputation risk. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of what sits behind the hostname, and it allows content to be swapped without any change at the network layer.
Closing Assessment
Treat the hostname as unsafe for any login, credential entry, payment or financial interaction. At most, view it passively without submitting data, and report it to the hosting platform's abuse channel if it arrived through an unsolicited message.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-gcg.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-gcg.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-gcg.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.