Verdict
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
portal-moonshot-ge9.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.
| What this site appears to be | A Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page stating that the requested URL or site does not exist on Netlify. It contains no service, business offer, forms, or sensitive content. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 3 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a subdomain on Netlify's free site-hosting platform. It shows only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 error page, which says the requested address does not exist on Netlify and invites visitors to build and deploy their own site. It offers no product, service, pricing, deposit or payment flow. Its apparent purpose is therefore unclear, and it currently works as an unclaimed or placeholder address under a "portal"-style name.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present, and they point to elevated risk. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the address as malicious, including a tier-one security vendor. This amounts to a confirmed blacklist entry. The domain is also associated with known phishing history. The subdomain name closely resembles the hosting platform's own name, and the analysis flagged it as a suspected brand lookalike. This is a suspicion, not a confirmed impersonation of a named legal entity. The most concerning behavioural finding is a mismatch between what is shown and what runs. The visible page is a static error notice with no forms. In all three sandbox sessions, however, the page held hidden forms that included password fields. It also produced thousands of DOM mutations after interaction, which a static 404 placeholder would not normally produce. This is consistent with a placeholder shell that can swap in a credential-collection page quickly. Abuse reports were also logged against a shared provider-owned address that serves this site. Because other tenants use that address, these reports do not by themselves implicate this site. They add no mitigating weight either. No conflicting legal identities were observed, because the site publishes no identity content at all. Evidence:
- Homepage: the only visible content is a 404 notice of about 368 characters, with no forms, offers or links.
- Sandbox behaviour: hidden forms appeared in 3 of 3 runs, including 3 password-form detections, and the maximum DOM change after interaction was 4,132 mutations.
- External reputation: 3 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, including one tier-one vendor, plus a prior phishing association.
- Shared provider address: 4 abuse reports, attributed to shared infrastructure rather than to this site specifically.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site makes no licensing, registration or regulated-activity claim. It has no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages, so there is no on-site disclosure to assess. Because it offers no financial or commercial service, no licence is expected today. The real-world operator is unverified, and ownership and governance remain opaque. The site gives no named entity, jurisdiction or accountable party. The environment around the site is technically orderly, but that reflects the hosting platform and does not establish the operator's legitimacy. The valid organisation-validated certificate belongs to the platform rather than to whoever controls this subdomain. No broker or third-party regulatory record matched this site. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, licence number, jurisdiction or contact details are disclosed.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, US).
- Transport encryption: a TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV) to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
What to Verify Next
The first step is to establish where the address came from. If it arrived in an email, message, advertisement or QR code, the sender should be contacted through a separately sourced, offline or independently published channel, and asked whether the address is genuine. Any organisation claimed to be behind a "portal" at this address should be checked against that organisation's own official website, reached by typing the known address directly. If no organisation can be tied to it, the referring message or link should be reported to the sender's organisation and to the hosting platform's abuse process. Official support channels for any claimed brand should be confirmed independently, not through anything reached from this address. Evidence:
- Homepage: names no operator, brand or service that could be cross-checked.
- Sandbox behaviour: the hidden password-capable forms mean the page's real purpose cannot be inferred from what it displays.
- External reputation: the existing detections make the referring source, not the site, the best starting point for verification.
Summary Verdict
The available evidence supports a clearly cautionary, elevated-risk posture. A static placeholder front, concealed credential-capable forms, a lookalike name and confirmed adverse threat-intelligence detections converge on a pattern consistent with a phishing staging page. The operator's identity is unverified, and nothing observed offsets the adverse reputation.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind Amazon-operated edge infrastructure that the analysis recognises as a mainstream provider. Every observed address is an edge address, and the origin server could not be seen. That prevents independent verification of where the content actually lives and can mask rapid content swaps. The provider is a mitigating factor only. It cannot offset the reputation risk and does not indicate a legitimate operator.
Closing Assessment
Use should be limited to passive viewing, if the page is opened at all. No credentials, personal data, payment details or wallet connections should be entered. Nothing should be downloaded, and no further links should be followed from it. Anyone who reached it through an unsolicited message should treat that message as suspect and report it.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-ge9.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-ge9.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-ge9.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.