Verdict
psykologidialog.dk is low-trust and potentially risky.
Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.
| What this site appears to be | Danish-language website for a private psychologist practice providing therapy services, contact details (phone, email, physical address), CVR number, prices and resources. Includes newsletter signup and downloadable/online products. No signs of credential harvesting or financial fraud. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: UNKNOWN
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 3 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0 reportsAbuseIPDB; shared hosting inflates this count | Noted |
| Domain age | 14 years oldRegistered history | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2013Public history exists | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by YR2 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: more than 10 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2013.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Overview
The website is a Danish-language private psychologist practice presenting individual and couples therapy, telephone and face-to-face sessions, practical information, paid online products, downloadable guides, and newsletter content. Its apparent business model is the provision of professional therapy services and related educational materials.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site’s visible content is consistent with a local therapy practice and does not present credential-harvesting forms, financial fraud mechanics, brand impersonation, or phishing features. However, this benign page presentation is contradicted by confirmed external blacklist status and three malicious detections, creating a material risk for sensitive interaction despite the absence of an on-site abuse pattern. No identity contradiction was observed across the supplied evidence, and the available linkage to a real-world person remains likely rather than independently verified.
- External reputation checks recorded 3 malicious detections and a confirmed blacklist hit.
- The homepage presents therapy services, contact details, prices, and educational resources rather than investment or payment-credential functionality.
- Browser inspection of the homepage found no login form, hidden form, password submission, wallet connection, or external posting activity.
- Domain registration telemetry records registration on 2012-12-12, with an age of 13.7 years; historical records span 2013–2025 with 73 archive snapshots across 13 years.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The pages describe a private psychologist practice and include practical information such as prices, opening hours, privacy material, referral information, cancellation rules, and a CVR number. The supplied content does not establish that a professional licence or regulatory registration has been independently verified; this is a verification gap rather than, by itself, evidence of fraud. The stated business model is ordinary professional service delivery with paid therapy and online educational products, but the external reputation contradiction materially limits the confidence that can be placed in the site’s apparent legitimacy.
- The “About,” “Practical,” and “Contact” content identifies a psychologist practice, provides a physical address and telephone contact, and references a CVR number.
- The site includes pages for privacy policy, prices, health insurance, medical referral, cancellation rules, and opening hours.
- No professional licence authority or licence number is supplied in the available evidence.
- The site’s transport encryption is DV TLS issued by YR2, valid until 2026-10-24.
What to Verify Next
Before any sensitive interaction, an independent check should confirm that the named practitioner and CVR details correspond to the relevant Danish business and professional registries. Contact details should be validated through an independently sourced channel, and any appointment, payment, or document exchange should be paused until the external reputation contradiction has been resolved. The official support and contact channels should also be confirmed through an offline or independently obtained source.
- The available identity linkage is classified as likely, not verified.
- The site publishes a CVR reference and physical contact details that can be checked against authoritative Danish records.
- The available regulatory disclosure state is unclear.
- The external reputation findings require resolution before sensitive use.
Summary Verdict
The website presents as a plausible professional-service practice, but its overall trust posture is low because the apparently benign site content is outweighed by confirmed external threat-reputation contradictions. The appropriate classification is elevated sensitive-interaction risk, with legitimacy remaining apparent rather than proven.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is hosted on Google Cloud and resolves to a single directly observed address; no CDN, edge-IP layer, WAF, or origin-candidate separation was identified. This infrastructure is technically ordinary but provides no additional CDN/WAF mitigation for the reputation concerns described above.
Closing Assessment
Sensitive actions such as account access, submission of personal information, document exchange, or payment should be deferred until the practitioner’s independent identity and the external threat findings have been satisfactorily reconciled.
Written analysis generated 2026-08-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by registration and ownership, analysis engine.
01 Governance Risk
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
02 Sensitive Interaction Risk
- The analysis matched a pattern TrustSniffer treats as a direct threat to a visitor.Analysis engine
signal:direct_threat
Identity verification
| Status | LIKELY |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 73/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 74% |
- Trusted social count=1
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of psykologidialog.dk.
- The request stayed on psykologidialog.dk. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by siteground.net, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2026-12-31. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2013-01-30. Clear
- It is hosted on GOOGLE, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | GOOGLE - Google LLC, US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 35.214.208.116 |
| Name servers | ns1.siteground.net, ns2.siteground.net |
| SSL issuer | YR2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-10-24 |
| Domain age | 13.70 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2026-12-31 |
| Archive first seen | 2013-01-30 |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about psykologidialog.dk at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.