Is pump-voting-9s.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

pump-voting-9s.netlify.app
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

25 OUT OF 100
Low Trust

pump-voting-9s.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

What this site appears to beThe page displays a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error, indicating the requested path or site does not exist on the Netlify hosting platform. It contains no service description, offer, or interactive elements.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines2 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain ageNot availableNo registration record was returnedNoted
Web archiveNever archivedNo public history of this siteWatch
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1Noted

The page as captured

https://pump-voting-9s.netlify.app/
Screenshot of the pump-voting-9s.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What pump-voting-9s.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
  • The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

Full analysis

Overview

This website is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform. Its hostname suggests a token-voting or "pump"-themed service, but the page it serves is only Netlify's generic "Site not found" 404 placeholder. A visitor sees no product, service, pricing, contact details, or legal identity. The business model and purpose cannot be inferred from what the page shows.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Confirmed contradictions are present. Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and an external blacklist listing is active, so the site is blacklisted by third-party reputation sources. This is decisive. The hostname is also a near-exact lookalike of the hosting platform's own brand, and the page analysis flags it as a suspected brand-impersonation pattern. That flag is a suspicion, not a confirmed impersonation. The visible page and the observed behavior also do not match. The visible content is a bare 404 error with no forms, yet the behavioral sandbox detected concealed forms in every run, including password-type fields. It also recorded very heavy page restructuring after interaction and an almost entirely external request profile. A hidden credential-capture surface behind an innocuous error shell is a recognised pattern for staged phishing infrastructure. Two abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses, but they relate to shared provider infrastructure and are discounted. They are not attributed to this site. Contradictions between legal identities were not observed, because the page names no entity at all.

Evidence
  • Homepage: the content is a platform 404 notice with no visible form, offer, or contact route, yet concealed forms were detected in all three sandbox runs.
  • Homepage behavior: a peak of about 4,130 page mutations after interaction, with external traffic reaching roughly 99.6% of requests in the peak run.
  • Reputation: two engines rate the domain malicious and one suspicious, and an external blacklist listing is confirmed.
  • Hostname: it closely resembles the hosting platform's brand, and the page analysis rates this suspected impersonation as high-confidence.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no legal pages, terms, privacy policy, licence, registration number, or named operator, so there is no on-site identity material to assess. The real-world operator remains unverified. The site makes no regulated-activity claim, and no broker-reputation record matched it. Reputational concerns therefore rest on the threat-intelligence signals above, not on any licensing assertion. The valid OV-level transport certificate identifies the hosting platform as its subject organisation. It confirms the platform's identity, not that of whoever operates this subdomain.

Evidence
  • Homepage: the page names no company, address, licence, or registration number, and no legal-notice or terms page is reachable.
  • Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
  • Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).

What to Verify Next

Anyone who received this link should first confirm, through an independent offline route, who sent it and what service it was meant to reach. The sender should also be asked to name the official, standalone address of that service. Any claim of a token-voting or related service should be checked against channels the claimant's brand publishes independently, not against this hostname. Because the hostname can be repointed to different content at any time, the address should be re-assessed before any later reliance on it. Anyone encountering it in unsolicited messages may report it to the hosting platform's abuse channel.

Evidence
  • Homepage: no official contact, product, or operator information is available to authenticate against.
  • Behavioral capture: concealed password-type forms were observed on a page that visibly offers no login.
  • Reputation: the active third-party listings mean any promotional message pointing to this address should be treated as unsolicited until proven otherwise.

Summary Verdict

The site sits in a clearly elevated-risk posture. The confirmed third-party listings and the mismatch between its innocuous visible face and its concealed form behavior outweigh the technical hygiene signals that would otherwise be neutral. Its apparent legitimacy cannot be established, and the available evidence is consistent with disposable or staged infrastructure.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through an AWS-based CDN/WAF, and all observed addresses are provider edge nodes on a recognised, trusted provider. No origin server was observable. This is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of the true host and can mask rapid content swaps. The infrastructure's quality cannot offset the confirmed reputation risk.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet interaction, or payment, and passive viewing is the only reasonable use. Links to it received through messages or social channels should not be followed or forwarded. Anyone who has already entered credentials here should change them immediately and enable multi-factor authentication.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.

01 External reputation

  • Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH

02 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS
  • The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH
  • The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION

03 Page content

  • The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNVERIFIED
Identity score30/100
Identity verification confidence50%
  • No on-site identity signals detected

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of pump-voting-9s.netlify.app.

  • The request stayed on pump-voting-9s.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNot available
HostingAMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2a05:d014:58f:6200::259
Name serversNot available
CDN / edge networkDetected (aws)
Resolved IP addresses4
Edge IP addresses4
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerDigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
SSL expiry2027-03-19
Domain ageNot available (no registration date was returned)
Domain expiryNot available
Archive first seenNot available
Archive snapshots0
ReputationVirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about pump-voting-9s.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about pump-voting-9s.netlify.app

Is pump-voting-9s.netlify.app a scam?

TrustSniffer found several risk patterns on pump-voting-9s.netlify.app. It scored 25 out of 100 on 2026-10-21, a low-trust result. That is not proof of fraud: it means the evidence did not support treating the site as safe.

Is pump-voting-9s.netlify.app safe to use?

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

What is the trust score of pump-voting-9s.netlify.app?

pump-voting-9s.netlify.app scored 25 out of 100 on 2026-10-21, which places it in the low-trust band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-21 · how we assess · report a mistake