Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
tessera-check.web.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 3% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20263 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR4 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Overview
This is a recently launched web application titled "Tessera App", served from a subdomain of a shared application-hosting namespace rather than from a standalone registered domain. It presents a single script-driven page with a large amount of text and heavy dynamic behaviour. The captured content does not establish a clear product, operator or business model.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The assessment is clearly cautionary. Several reputation sources currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, which amounts to a confirmed blacklisting signal and is the decisive factor in the risk posture. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed, and the site did not trigger a malware-distribution or compromised-site listing. Behaviour testing also found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden or externally posting password forms, page cloaking or fingerprinting. Those clean results do not offset the reputation hits. The homepage generates an unusually large volume of third-party traffic: hundreds of external background requests, dozens of outbound POST submissions and a handful of requests to destinations outside the recognised-service set. It also undergoes very large page rewrites after interaction and logs repeated script errors. That profile is consistent with an application that pulls most of its content and logic from elsewhere, and it makes the destination of submitted data hard to reason about. A small number of abuse reports exist against an address used by the site's delivery provider. Because that address is shared infrastructure, those reports are a weak signal and are not reliably attributable to this site.
- Homepage: two reputation engines rate the site malicious and one rates it suspicious, and a further external blacklist source concurs.
- Homepage behaviour: 332 external background requests, 26 outbound POSTs, 9 requests to non-recognised destinations, about 7,400 DOM mutations after interaction, and 15 console errors across three consecutive test runs.
- Homepage behaviour: no wallet, clipboard, hidden-form, cloaking or fingerprinting activity was observed in any run.
- Hosting infrastructure: 4 abuse reports, low confidence, against a shared provider address, so only weakly attributable to this site.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site discloses no operator identity that could be tied to a real-world person or company, and no licence or registration information was found in the captured content. The domain is very new, with a registration history of only weeks. Registration ownership is incomplete, which is ownership opacity and not an identity contradiction. Because no real-world operator is established, nothing on the site can be treated as an authorised or regulated service. The absence of licensing detail is a verification gap and not proof of wrongdoing. Here it compounds the reputational warnings rather than standing alone. The site's transport encryption is valid, but a domain-validated certificate only confirms control of the hostname and says nothing about the operator.
- Domain provenance: registration continuity of roughly 49 days (~0.13 years), with an incomplete ownership record.
- Web-archive depth: 3 snapshots, from 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-22 (1 year tracked), so the site has a very short and sparse history.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR4 (DV), valid to 2026-12-22, which proves hostname control only.
- Homepage: page title "Tessera App"; no legal entity, licence number or regulator named in the captured content.
What to Verify Next
Do not transact or authenticate until an independent route establishes who runs the service. Look for an official announcement of the "Tessera" application on a channel that is already trusted, such as a known company site, verified social account or published press material. If any regulated activity is claimed, check the named operator against the relevant national financial or consumer registry directly, without following links from this site. Contact channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route. Any wallet connection, payment or credential entry should wait until these checks pass.
- Homepage: no named operator or registry reference that could be checked.
- Domain provenance: a registration of only weeks, so there is no long-standing reputation to rely on.
- Reputation: current malicious and suspicious detections that a reputable operator would normally be able to explain or have cleared.
Summary Verdict
The evidence converges on an elevated-risk posture. The site is a newly created, operator-anonymous property with active adverse reputation detections, and nothing in its content or sparse history offsets them. Its technical hygiene is basic and does not support legitimacy. Legitimacy cannot be inferred, and the risk classification stands.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through Fastly's CDN and WAF network from AS54113 in the United States. Both observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently confirmed. The CDN adds availability and basic protection, which is a minor mitigating factor. It does not vouch for the content or the operator, and it cannot offset the external threat detections.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US), with two edge addresses and no visible origin.
Closing Assessment
At most, the site should be viewed read-only. No credentials, payment details, wallet connections or personal data should be submitted, and nothing should be downloaded, until the operator is independently identified and the current detections are resolved.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of tessera-check.web.app.
- The request stayed on tessera-check.web.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-06. Clear
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2620:0:890::100 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 2 |
| Edge IP addresses | 2 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR4 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | 0.13 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-06 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 3% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about tessera-check.web.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.