Is xmagnetics.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

xmagnetics.vercel.app
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

xmagnetics.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines18 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingListed as unsafeGoogleRisk
Abuse reports on the host0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 87 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain ageNot availableNo registration record was returnedNoted
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by WR1Noted
Hosted byAMAZON-02Server in USNoted

The page as captured

https://xmagnetics.vercel.app/
Screenshot of the xmagnetics.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What xmagnetics.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

xMagnetic presents itself as a decentralized-finance protocol on the XRP Ledger. Its page title advertises swapping, staking, bridging and earning a token called XMR. The site is a single-page web application served from a free subdomain on a shared application-hosting platform, not from an independently registered domain. It appears to be a crypto-asset trading and yield front end that invites visitors to move digital assets through its interface.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they are the decisive factor in this assessment. Several major security engines independently flag the site, and a leading browser-protection service classifies it under the social-engineering (deceptive-site) category. Together these amount to a confirmed blacklisting from multiple independent sources. The reputation risk is therefore assessed as high, and the platform's protections do not offset it. No conflicting legal entities were found, and no direct brand impersonation was established. The danger comes from external threat detections, not from competing identity claims. The product mix the page advertises (swap, stake, bridge, earn) is the kind of surface through which asset-drain and deceptive-site schemes typically operate. In sandbox testing, all of the page's outbound data submissions went to destinations outside the platform's recognized services, and a large share of its network traffic was third-party. No wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer behavior, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or content cloaking were observed in the sessions run, so the specific mechanism behind the detections is unconfirmed. Abuse reports exist against a shared edge address of the hosting platform. They are discounted as reputational evidence because that address serves many unrelated tenants and carries no reputation penalty of its own. Evidence:

  • Homepage: flagged as malicious by a substantial number of independent security engines, including four major tier-one vendors, with a social-engineering classification from the browser-protection service.
  • Homepage behavior: three of three external POST requests went to non-whitelisted destinations, and about 80% of observed activity was external.
  • Homepage behavior: no wallet-connect, drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form or cloaking activity across three successful sandbox runs.
  • Hosting infrastructure: 87 abuse reports on the shared edge IP 216.198.79.3, attributed to the shared provider and discounted.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The evidence identifies no licensing, registration or regulatory standing for the operator, and the real-world entity behind the site has not been independently connected to any person or company. The site does not appear in third-party broker-reputation records, which is a neutral data point and neither a clearance nor a warning. A protocol that offers token swaps, staking and cross-chain bridging would normally be expected to state who operates it and under what jurisdiction. That expectation is a transparency gap for the next-steps list. By itself it is not evidence of fraud. The service's use of a platform-issued subdomain gives it no standalone brand domain that could be tied to a legal entity. Evidence:

  • Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), ARIN registry, US.
  • Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27 (32 days remaining). A valid DV certificate confirms encryption only and says nothing about operator identity.
  • Protocol directories: the DeFi protocol directory checked has no listing for this protocol, so no TVL figure could be recorded.

What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, confirm through the official channels of the XRP Ledger project and its documentation whether this protocol and its XMR token exist and which domain is canonical. Check any regulator registry in the jurisdiction the operator claims, and treat the lack of a listed operator as unresolved. Confirm official support and contact channels through an independent, offline route and not through links on the site. Security teams should also check the flagged status with the engines and browser-protection services concerned and see whether it has been remediated or reviewed. Evidence:

  • Homepage: the title advertises swap, stake, bridge and earn functions without naming an operator in the captured page signals.
  • Threat listing: the social-engineering classification and the multi-engine detections were current at the time of analysis.
  • Hosting infrastructure: the free platform subdomain means the canonical brand domain cannot be confirmed from the site itself.

Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated, high-risk posture, driven by consistent external threat detections that outweigh every neutral or protective technical factor. Its legitimacy cannot be established, and its real-world operator remains unverified. Only passive, read-only observation is consistent with the evidence.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site runs on a major shared application-hosting platform with a global CDN/WAF, resolving to six edge addresses, all within the Amazon network. The true origin server was not observable, so independent verification of the underlying host, and of any rapid content swaps behind the edge, is not possible. Encryption and a stable, healthy response profile are mitigating factors only. They do not offset the threat detections.

Closing Assessment

Do not log in, connect a wallet, enter credentials or move funds through this site, and do not download anything from it. Reconsider only if the threat listings are cleared and the operator is independently confirmed.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

01 External reputation

  • An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL

02 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
  • The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS

03 Registration and ownership

  • The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 87 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNKNOWN
Identity score50/100
Identity verification confidence30%
  • AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of xmagnetics.vercel.app.

  • The request stayed on xmagnetics.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNot available
HostingAMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP216.198.79.3
Name serversNot available
CDN / edge networkDetected
Resolved IP addresses6
Edge IP addresses6
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerWR1
SSL expiry2026-11-27
Domain ageNot available (no registration date was returned)
Domain expiryNot available
Archive first seenNot available
Archive snapshotsNot counted (archive lookup incomplete)
ReputationVirusTotal: 18 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 87 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 1 match

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about xmagnetics.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about xmagnetics.vercel.app

Is xmagnetics.vercel.app a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of xmagnetics.vercel.app found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-25, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is xmagnetics.vercel.app safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of xmagnetics.vercel.app?

xmagnetics.vercel.app scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-25, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-25 · how we assess · report a mistake