Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
amlget.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 13 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 87 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WR1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a single-page web application hosted on a free subdomain of a public application-hosting platform. It presents itself as "AML Get", a TRON AML verification and TRC20 risk-analysis platform. To a visitor it appears to offer anti-money-laundering screening of cryptocurrency addresses and tokens on the TRON network. The apparent business model is a crypto-compliance or wallet-screening utility. That is a category where visitors are normally asked to submit wallet addresses or transaction details, and that makes the site a sensitive-interaction surface.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present, and the assessment is clearly cautionary. A confirmed blacklist listing applies to this domain, and a substantial cluster of independent security engines classify it as malicious. Two of those engines are widely regarded top-tier vendors. This agreement across vendors is what places the site in an elevated-risk posture, and no hosting-platform credibility offsets it. No brand impersonation, conflicting legal identities, or phishing-page confirmation were established, so the concern rests on the external threat listings. The homepage's compliance-themed positioning for TRON and TRC20 assets is exactly the kind of framing that can be used to induce visitors to disclose wallet addresses or transaction data. Page-level behavior was mixed. The site generated a heavy volume of calls to third-party endpoints, including several POST submissions to destinations outside the recognised-service set. This is a data-egress concern when the page invites user input. The sandbox did not observe wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, cloaking or fingerprinting. These are mitigating observations and do not cancel the external detections. Evidence:
- Homepage: titled as a TRON AML verification and TRC20 risk-analysis platform. It sits on a shared platform subdomain rather than an independent branded domain.
- External reputation: 13 security engines flagged the domain as malicious and 1 as suspicious, including two tier-one vendors. A blacklist listing is confirmed.
- Homepage sandbox: 17 external XHR/fetch and 18 external POST requests across 3 runs, with 3 POSTs to non-allowlisted destinations. No wallet-connect, drainer, clipboard-hijack or hidden-form behavior was recorded.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The evidence does not confirm a regulator registration or licence for the operator. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the site. The operator's real-world identity is unverified, and ownership remains opaque. This is an administrative limitation and not an identity contradiction. A platform that markets AML verification would normally be expected to disclose a responsible legal entity and its compliance standing, and this site's disclosures are unclear. The valid transport-encryption certificate shows only that traffic is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site or whether it is safe. Evidence:
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US) on addresses registered with ARIN.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-11-27, with 32 days remaining. DV validates domain control only and does not validate the organisation.
- Homepage and legal disclosure: the disclosure state is unclear. No regulator registration was confirmed, and no third-party regulatory or broker-database match exists.
What to Verify Next
No interaction involving wallet addresses, credentials or funds should occur while the external threat listings stand. Before any engagement, an independent route should confirm which legal entity operates the service, for example by asking a known contact at the claimed operator. If the operator claims compliance credentials, these should be checked directly with the relevant financial-intelligence or licensing registry. Official support and contact channels should also be confirmed offline. The domain's threat-intelligence status should be re-checked after the operator publishes a clean-up or remediation statement. Evidence:
- Homepage: it invites AML and risk analysis of TRC20 assets, which implies submission of wallet or transaction data.
- External reputation: the confirmed listings are the reason to defer any engagement until they are cleared.
- Third-party coverage: no broker or regulator record corroborates the operator's claims.
Summary Verdict
The site is in a high-risk, cautionary posture. The decisive factor is a converging external threat assessment, supported by a confirmed blacklist listing. The service's real-world identity is unverified, and the evidence provides no basis for treating it as trustworthy. Technical hygiene such as valid encryption and recognisable hosting is outweighed by the reputational findings.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served through a major cloud-hosted CDN/WAF platform on AS16509 (Amazon), with edge addresses in the United States. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This hides hosting-level verification and could mask rapid content swaps. Protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the external threat detections. The 87 abuse reports recorded against one of the edge addresses are discounted. They relate to a shared provider address with a zero-confidence abuse rating and are not attributable to this site.
Closing Assessment
The site should be limited to read-only viewing. Account login, credential entry, wallet-address submission and any financial interaction should be avoided until the external listings are cleared and the operator is independently identified. Nothing should be downloaded from it.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY
03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 87 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of amlget.vercel.app.
- The request stayed on amlget.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 216.198.79.3 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 13 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 87 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about amlget.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.