Is audit-crypto.live a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 3/100

Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

The website at audit-crypto.live is a recently established single-page web property. Its homepage is titled "Clearblocks & AMLBot: Revolutionizing Finance With Confidence" and carries a substantial amount of text. It presents itself as a crypto-compliance or audit-style financial service, using the names of recognised blockchain-compliance brands. Its apparent purpose is to attract visitors to what looks like a financial-technology offering. No independently verifiable operator, product catalogue or service terms were available to confirm that purpose.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is the decisive area of concern. Multiple tier-one security vendors currently classify the domain as malicious, and the volume of detections is high enough to trigger an automatic critical-risk override. The site is blacklisted by external threat-intelligence sources, and the domain also matches a known phishing pattern. The homepage borrows the names of established compliance and anti-money-laundering brands in its title, while the domain itself is a generic "audit-crypto" label. No connection between the site and those brands could be established. That mismatch is typical of brand-borrowing lures aimed at crypto users, who are likely to trust a compliance-themed page. No two conflicting legal entities were found, since the site publishes no legal identity to compare. Behavioral testing showed no wallet-drainer routines, clipboard tampering, hidden forms or third-party data posts. That is a neutral observation only, because it cannot offset the independent detections or the domain's age profile. Any interactive element could change after the capture, so the observed quiet behavior does not make the page safe. Evidence:

• Homepage: the page title invokes two third-party compliance brand names that the domain does not demonstrably belong to.
• Reputation: three tier-one security vendors and a broader group of engines flag the domain as malicious, and a phishing history is recorded against it.
• Domain provenance: registered 2026-07-13 (~0.27 years old) through Dynadot Inc, so the domain is only a few months old.
• Web archive: a single snapshot, captured 2026-09-22 and covering one year (2026), shows no earlier history.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured pages disclose no licensing status, registered company or named operator. Regulatory disclosure on the site is therefore unclear, and ownership details are incomplete. That absence is a verification gap, not a finding of fraud on its own. Here, however, it sits alongside confirmed threat detections, and the gap offers no mitigation. A site that names compliance brands but identifies no accountable entity gives a prospective user nothing to check its claims against. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched to the domain. The absence of a regulatory record is therefore neutral context, not a clearance. Evidence:

• Homepage and available pages: no company name, licence or registration number is published.
• Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US) under the ARIN registry.
• Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by WE1 at domain-validation (DV) level and is valid to 2026-12-11. This confirms an encrypted connection only and says nothing about the operator.
• Third-party registries: no matching broker or regulatory profile was found for the domain.

What to Verify Next

Any claimed affiliation with the named compliance brands should be tested independently. Open each brand's official website by typing its address directly, then check whether that brand lists this domain as an official property or partner. Check any claimed licence or registration against the relevant regulator's public register, using a register URL you found yourself, not one supplied on the site. Re-check the domain's reputation across major security vendors before any engagement, since a compromised or newly flagged domain can be cleaned or re-listed. Confirm official support and contact channels through an offline or otherwise independent route. Evidence:

• Homepage: the compliance-brand wording in the page title is the main claim to confirm with the brands directly.
• Domain age: registration in July 2026 means no long record exists to rely on, so independent confirmation carries the weight.
• Certificate: expiry is December 2026, which leaves a short window before the encryption credential must be renewed.

Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external threat detections, a phishing association and a very young, thinly documented domain point the same way. The site is classed as unsafe for sensitive interaction. Its technically clean browsing behavior does not change that posture.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is an edge server. The origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently verified, and content could be swapped quickly behind the edge. The protection and the valid certificate are mitigating factors only, because they are shared by legitimate and malicious sites alike. They cannot offset the reputation risk.

Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. Do not log in, enter credentials, connect a wallet, make payments or download files from it until the independent checks above have been completed and the external threat listings have been cleared.