Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
bullvers.icu shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 9 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20262 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The website at bullvers.icu is a newly registered site whose captured homepage carries only a short block of text under the page title "FASTPANEL". The title suggests a hosting-control-panel or dashboard-style service. The page gives a visitor no clear description of a product, operator, or business model, so the site's purpose cannot be established from its own content.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
The site carries hard contradictions and warrants an explicitly cautionary posture. Several major security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and the external reputation picture amounts to a confirmed blacklisting. Because the domain is very new, this is not a legacy listing that might be stale. Nothing in the evidence points to a compromised older property. The flags cover the domain as a whole and are not tied to a single file. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, and the evidence does not independently confirm phishing. The blacklisting is nonetheless decisive. The page's panel-style branding is also the sort of generic front that credential-harvesting or fake-service campaigns commonly use, and the page's sparse content gives no counter-evidence. Behavioral testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or cloaking, but one pattern stands out. The page generated heavy outbound traffic, with dozens of external fetch requests and many external POST submissions in a short session. A small number of those went to destinations outside the commonly recognized service set. For a page with so little visible content, that traffic volume is disproportionate.
- Homepage: a short text block under the title "FASTPANEL", with no described product, operator, or terms.
- Reputation checks: multiple recognized security vendors rate the domain malicious, with additional suspicious ratings. The domain appears on an external blacklist.
- Browser behavior testing: 36 external XHR/fetch calls and 24 external POST requests, with 3 going to non-whitelisted destinations. 6 console errors were logged. No wallet, clipboard, or cloaking abuse was detected.
- Domain registered 2026-09-02 (~0.15 years old). The web archive holds 2 snapshots, from 2026-09-17 to 2026-09-22 (about 1 year tracked), so there is effectively no history.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The homepage discloses no company name, registration number, licensing status, privacy policy, or terms of service. The site makes no regulated-service claims that would call for a license. Even so, the lack of any accountable operator or legal basis is the main disclosure gap for a site asking for engagement. The registrant is hidden behind a privacy service at registrar NameSilo, which is an administrative limitation and not in itself a security finding. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry corresponds to this site. The only reputational signals are the threat detections described above. Given those detections, the lack of disclosure leaves nothing to offset them.
- Homepage: no operator identity, license, registration details, or legal pages in the captured content.
- Domain registration: held through NameSilo with a privacy-protected registrant, and set to run to 2027-09-02.
- Transport encryption: a TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-01. It confirms an encrypted connection but nothing about the operator's identity.
What to Verify Next
Before any interaction beyond viewing, the operator should be identified through an independent route, such as a verifiable corporate record or an established business contact, and not through details the site supplies about itself. Anyone who received a link to this domain by email, message, or advertisement should confirm with the supposed sender, through a separate known channel, that they sent it. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed independently. If the page is claimed to belong to a hosting or panel provider, that claim should be checked against the provider's own known domain. The threat-detection status should be re-checked after a reasonable interval, as it would be the first indicator of any remediation.
- Homepage: it shows a generic panel-style title and does not say which provider or organization it represents.
- Reputation status: the current security-vendor detections are the baseline against which any later change should be measured.
- Domain age: a registration of only a few weeks gives no prior record of legitimate operation to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The site presents a critical, high-risk posture. Confirmed blacklisting by external security sources is the decisive factor, and protective technical measures and a valid certificate do not offset it. Its newness, minimal content, and absence of a verifiable operator leave no positive evidence to weigh against that reputation.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is served from AS13335 through Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge nodes, so the origin server is not visible. A valid TLS certificate from a known issuer and a recognized hosting network are mitigating factors only, because this infrastructure is available to any customer and says nothing about the legitimacy of what it serves. The very new domain with few subdomains, and the edge-only visibility that can mask rapid content changes, add to the caution. Taken together, the infrastructure cannot offset the reputational risk.
Closing Assessment
At most, the site should be viewed read-only, from an isolated or disposable environment. No login, credential entry, personal data, or payment should be submitted, and nothing should be downloaded. Organizations should consider blocking the domain at the email and web gateway and reporting any link received to their security team.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
05 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of bullvers.icu.
- The request stayed on bullvers.icu. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NameSilo, LLC. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-02. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-17. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NameSilo, LLC |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3031::6815:4aac |
| Name servers | CARLOS.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, WALK.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-01 |
| Domain age | 0.15 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-02 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-17 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about bullvers.icu at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.