Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
bullvers.ws shows high-risk / scam indicators.
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 5 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months oldMost scam domains are under a year old | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 20262 snapshots | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by WE1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website is a minimal, single-page web presence branded "FASTPANEL". It presents only a short block of text under that title, with no visible product catalogue, company profile, or service description, and its business purpose cannot be determined from the content captured. It sits on a very recently registered domain under a rarely used country-code extension, and its page generates an unusually large volume of third-party network traffic for such a sparse landing page.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Hard contradictory signals are present. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently list the domain as malicious or suspicious, and one major security vendor is among those flagging it. This amounts to a confirmed blacklisting, and it is the decisive factor in the assessment. Page-level checks found no brand impersonation, no conflicting legal identities, and no explicit phishing form. That does not offset the external detections, because a page this thin can serve as a staging or redirect point. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential posts to outside parties, or content cloaking. It did record heavy outbound traffic: the homepage made dozens of background requests and many data submissions to external hosts, nearly all of its observed traffic was directed off-domain, and a few of those destinations were not recognised as standard services. A domain only weeks old, with this traffic profile and active external listings, should be treated as hostile until cleared. Evidence:
- Homepage, external reputation: 5 malicious and 2 suspicious detections across threat-intelligence engines, including a tier-one security vendor, with the domain recorded as externally blacklisted.
- Homepage, behavioural sandbox: 36 external background requests and 24 external POST submissions across 3 runs, up to 99.3% of requests directed externally, 3 to non-whitelisted destinations, plus 6 console errors.
- Homepage, content: the page carries roughly 396 characters of text under the title "FASTPANEL", and no legal, about, or contact pages were captured.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-09-02 (~0.14 years old), with only 2 archive snapshots spanning 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-17 (1 year tracked).
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured content includes no legal, terms, privacy, or about pages, so there is no on-site disclosure of an operating entity, jurisdiction, licence, or registration. No third-party broker or regulator record matches this domain, and the absence of such a record is not itself an accusation. Identity could not be independently tied to any real-world brand or person, so the site's legitimacy cannot be treated as established. The domain is registered through the corporate registrar NameSilo with a privacy-protection service shielding the registrant, which is an administrative detail rather than a contradiction. The site presents a valid transport-encryption certificate, but a basic domain-validated certificate confirms only an encrypted connection and says nothing about who operates the site. Evidence:
- Registration record: registrar NameSilo, LLC, expiring 2027-09-02, with the registrant shielded by a privacy service.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV level), valid to 2026-12-01, about 39 days remaining.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Homepage: no company name, licence number, or regulatory reference appears in the captured content.
What to Verify Next
Any engagement should begin with independent confirmation of who operates this site and what "FASTPANEL" is meant to be. If the site claims to be a hosting or server-management control panel, the claim should be checked against the official channels of the genuine software vendor, not through links or contact details found on this domain. Any business relationship should be validated through an offline or independently sourced route. The current threat listings should also be re-checked later, since a status that changes is the only indication that a compromise or abuse has been remediated. Evidence:
- Homepage: the title is the only identifying element, and there is no stated operator or product description.
- External reputation: active blacklisting means any later delisting would be a meaningful signal.
- Domain history: the domain's registration and archive record is only a few weeks long, so there is no track record to rely on.
Summary Verdict
The overall posture is clearly cautionary and high-risk. Confirmed blacklisting from multiple external sources, together with a very young domain, a sparse page, and heavy off-domain activity, outweighs the few technical hygiene signals present. Those signals include a valid certificate and a reputable registrar. No real-world identity is established, and the evidence does not support treating the site as legitimate.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and its observed addresses include edge servers plus one candidate origin address. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows the operator uses mainstream, professionally run infrastructure, but it neither proves legitimacy nor reduces the impact of the external threat detections, since shared edge infrastructure serves benign and malicious sites alike.
Closing Assessment
This site should not be used for login, credential entry, or any financial interaction. If it must be examined at all, that should happen only in an isolated, read-only environment with no files downloaded. Organisations should consider blocking it at the network or email-gateway level pending credible delisting.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it.Hosting and network
rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN
03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new.History in the web archive
rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE
04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
05 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator.Registration and ownership
rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN
Identity verification
| Status | UNKNOWN |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |
- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of bullvers.ws.
- The request stayed on bullvers.ws. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- Registration is published under NameSilo, LLC. Clear
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. Noted
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-02. Noted
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-06. Clear
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | NameSilo, LLC |
|---|---|
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::6815:2667 |
| Name servers | carlos.ns.cloudflare.com, walk.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 5 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 1 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-01 |
| Domain age | 0.14 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-02 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-06 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about bullvers.ws at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.