Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
kuroro-xyz.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Marketing/landing site for 'Kuroro Beasts', a play-to-earn gaming ecosystem that includes NFTs, a native token ($KURO) with an upcoming launch/airdrop, and links to third-party marketplaces for buying/renting assets. Describes game modes, team, and airdrop mechanics but does not present verifiable tokenomics, legal/regulatory credentials, or detailed economic assurances. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 2 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Overview
Kuroro Beasts is a marketing and landing website for a play-to-earn gaming ecosystem hosted on a free-tier shared subdomain. It presents a "multidimensional" world of elemental creatures, with games in various stages of release, NFT collections, a native $KURO token with an upcoming launch and airdrop, and outbound links to third-party marketplaces. Its apparent business model is revenue from NFT sales and rentals and from token utility inside the games.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Third-party reputation sources flag this site. Several independent security engines classify it as malicious or suspicious, and it is blacklisted by external feeds. This is a confirmed adverse reputational finding. It is not a finding of brand impersonation, phishing or conflicting legal identities, and none of those were observed. A lookalike check matched the hosting platform's own domain. This reflects the free-subdomain naming pattern and is not an impersonation claim against any specific brand. The homepage presents a high-stakes crypto-gaming proposition with thin substantiation. It promotes the Kuroro Ranch Telegram game, the upcoming Kuroro Wilds alpha, and a raffle for limited-edition "Kuroro Ancients" identity NFTs. It also promotes the NFT collections (Origins, Beasts, Trainer Badges), the Beast Brawl mode, and a $KURO token airdrop. The claim that users "own the assets" they play with and can carry them across all games is made without any tokenomics, supply or distribution schedule, or economic assurances. The value flow from airdrop and raffle participation to marketplace purchases on Treasure and LootRush is therefore opaque. The statement of asset ownership and portability is unsupported by anything a visitor can check on the page. The browser behavior analysis shows heavy external network activity: roughly half of all requests go to third-party hosts, mostly background data calls. None of these were to non-allow-listed destinations, and no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form or cloaking behavior was detected. The page has no login or payment form. The danger lies in the reputation flags and the token-and-NFT funnel, not in an observed exploit on the page. Evidence:
- Homepage: the game and token claims (Kuroro Ranch, Kuroro Wilds, the Ancients raffle, the $KURO airdrop, and the Origins, Beasts and Trainer Badges NFT collections) carry no tokenomics, supply or distribution disclosures.
- External reputation: two engines rate the site malicious and one rates it suspicious. Safe Browsing returned no hit, and no phishing or impersonation was confirmed.
- Homepage behavior: 77 external background requests were observed across 3 sandbox runs, with no non-allow-listed destinations, no wallet interaction, and no hidden or credential-collecting forms.
- Web archive: 5 snapshots between 2025-01-07 and 2025-03-01 (about 1 year tracked), a thin and recent footprint.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site presents no legal entity name, company registration, license or regulatory credential. It publishes no terms, privacy or risk-disclosure content that could be assessed, so the on-page disclosure position remains unclear. This is a verification and transparency gap. Both ownership and governance are opaque, and the operator cannot be tied to any real-world person or company. The site's hosting on a free-tier subdomain, rather than a project-owned domain, adds to the difficulty of attributing it. No broker-reputation dataset match was found, so there is no third-party regulatory or reputational record to weigh in either direction. Taken alone, the missing disclosures would not prove wrongdoing. In a token and NFT business that invites purchases, they leave no recourse path for participants. The page also gives no sign of search-engine metadata or structured business information. Evidence:
- Homepage: no company name, jurisdiction, license claim, or legal and risk-disclosure pages were found.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2027-01-11. DV confirms domain control only, not operator identity.
- Homepage metadata: no meta description, canonical tag or structured data.
What to Verify Next
Any dealing with the project should be preceded by independent corroboration of who runs it. That means confirming the project's official domain and social handles through independent, offline channels rather than through links on this page. It also means checking whether the team has a verifiable public track record and whether any registered entity stands behind the token and NFT offerings. The $KURO token contract, supply and distribution terms should be confirmed against independently published documentation before any participation in the airdrop or raffle. The marketplace listings should be checked directly on the named platforms, reached by manual navigation. The reputation flags should be treated as unresolved until the project's operators demonstrate they have been cleared or explained. Evidence:
- Homepage: the team is described, but no verifiable identities, contract addresses or audit references are published.
- Outbound links: the page links to two third-party NFT marketplaces and a Telegram destination; these were not followed or assessed.
- External reputation: the adverse flags are current and remain unexplained on the site.
Summary Verdict
The site carries an elevated-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation signals converge with a high-stakes token and NFT proposition whose operator cannot be identified and whose economics are unsupported. The attractive presentation and absence of observed on-page exploits do not offset this.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall over a valid TLS certificate. Its address space is dominated by Cloudflare edge servers, with only a small number of possible origin candidates visible, and the hosting provider has no abuse reports against it. This is a protective, mitigating factor. It shows the project uses mainstream delivery infrastructure, but it says nothing about who operates the site, and it cannot offset the external threat detections.
Closing Assessment
Interaction should be limited to read-only viewing. Wallet connections, account logins, credential entry, token or NFT purchases, and airdrop or raffle participation should be avoided until the operators are independently identified and the reputation flags are resolved.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, behaviour in a sandbox.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Page content
- The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content
rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG - The review of the page content rated it moderate risk.Page content
rule:PAGE_RISK_MED - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use.Page content
rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME
03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 55/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 60% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of kuroro-xyz.pages.dev.
- The request stayed on kuroro-xyz.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | Not available |
| Country | Not available |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2ee0 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Lookup incomplete |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-11 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not available |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about kuroro-xyz.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.