Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
portal-moonshot-9zg.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Default Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page with no site content, forms, links, or offers. The intended site cannot be assessed from this capture. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 3 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Web archive | Never archivedNo public history of this site | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
This website address is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform. When captured, it served only Netlify's default "Site not found" error page, which says the visitor followed a broken link or entered a URL that does not exist. The page carries a platform reference identifier, a "Start building" prompt and no other content. It presents no products, offers, forms, navigation or stated operator, so no business model can be derived from it. The address pattern reads as a generic portal or staging-style label rather than a named brand.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present, and they are the decisive factor in this assessment. Multiple independent security engines currently flag the address as malicious or suspicious, including a top-tier vendor, and this constitutes a confirmed blacklist listing. A lookalike heuristic also associated the address with the hosting platform's own brand, because the label mimics the platform's naming. This is a similarity indicator, not a confirmed impersonation. Behavioural testing found hidden forms and password-type fields in all three sandbox runs, plus very large DOM changes after interaction. The visible capture shows no forms at all, so the page presented to a casual visitor differs from the markup the browser actually loaded. That pattern is consistent with a placeholder that can be swapped for credential-collection content at short notice. No legal-entity conflict was observed. Two abuse reports exist against a shared provider address, but they are attributed to shared infrastructure and are discounted rather than treated as evidence against this site. No wallet-connection, clipboard-manipulation or fingerprinting behaviour was observed. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: a default platform 404 page with a 368-character body, no links, no forms and no stated operator.
- Reputation checks: several independent engines flag the address, including a top-tier vendor, so the blacklist listing is confirmed.
- Behavioural sandbox (3 of 3 runs): hidden forms and password-type fields detected, with about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, none of which appear in the visible capture.
- Two abuse reports against an Amazon-operated address were attributed to shared infrastructure and discounted.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The captured page contains no legal, terms, privacy, about or licensing content, so no disclosure of an operating entity, registration number or regulator exists to assess. The operator's real-world identity is unverified, and ownership is opaque. No licensing claim is made, and no third-party broker-database entry matches the address, so no regulatory status can be inferred in either direction. The transport-layer facts below are authentic but show only that the hosting platform's infrastructure is functioning. They say nothing about who controls the content. Evidence:
- Served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 at Organization Validation level, with the subject organisation listed as Netlify, Inc and validity to 2027-03-19.
- Homepage: no company name, licence, address or contact channel is published.
- No broker-reputation record matches the address.
What to Verify Next
Because the content cannot be assessed and the reputation signals are adverse, the address should be treated as unvetted. Anyone expecting to deal with a counterparty at this address should first obtain its URL through an independent, offline channel, such as a signed contract, an official brand directory or a known contact, and should confirm that the counterparty actually operates it. Whoever received the link should ask the sender to confirm it out of band. Official support or contact channels should be confirmed independently. If the site is the user's own, the deployment should be reviewed on the hosting platform for an unpublished or misconfigured project, and for any unauthorised content changes that could explain the hidden form behaviour. Evidence:
- Homepage capture: the platform reports that no site is published at this path, so there is nothing to validate against.
- The mismatch between the visible page and the hidden form markup found in the sandbox requires a content review before any further use.
- Reputation listings are current, so a fresh re-scan is needed after any remediation.
Summary Verdict
The assessment is clearly cautionary. Corroborated external threat detections, behavioural markup that contradicts the visible page, and an unverified operator together outweigh the technically valid transport security. The address cannot currently be regarded as safe for any sensitive interaction, and the unverified operator leaves the question of intent open.
Infrastructure Integrity
The address resolves through Amazon-operated infrastructure, and all four observed IP addresses are edge nodes of a recognised CDN/WAF. The origin server is not observable. The certificate is valid and issued under a mainstream authority, and the hosting is mainstream. This is a mitigating factor only: it shows that the platform is reputable. It does not show that the content or its controller is. Edge-only visibility also limits independent verification of what sits behind the address and allows content to be replaced quickly. This infrastructure does not offset the reputation risk.
Closing Assessment
The address should be used read-only at most. Credentials, logins, personal data and payments should not be entered or sent here, and nothing should be downloaded from it, until the external listings are cleared and the operator is independently identified.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-9zg.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-9zg.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-9zg.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.