Is portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app
Download PDF Check another site How we score

Verdict

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

0 OUT OF 100
Critical Risk

portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

Sensitive Interaction Risk Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

Evidence status and limitations

Evidence completeness: Not recorded

  • The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
  • Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

Malware engines3 flagged itVirusTotalRisk
Google Safe BrowsingNot listedGoogleClear
Abuse reports on the host1% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reportsClear
Domain ageNot availableNo registration record was returnedNoted
CertificateEncrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1Noted
Hosted byAMAZON-02Server in USNoted

The page as captured

https://portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app/
Screenshot of the portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment
What portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now.

Key findings

  • Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
  • At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

Full analysis

Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a public application-hosting platform, with a name that suggests a "portal". When captured, its homepage showed only a short generic "site not found" notice, and no branding, products, services or operator identity. Its apparent purpose cannot be established from visible content. The page resembles an unclaimed, removed or placeholder deployment, yet automated browsing runs found concealed form elements behind it.

Scam/Impersonation Risk

The evidence shows active threat-intelligence contradictions, so the site is treated as high-risk. Several independent security engines rate it as malicious or suspicious, and one tier-one vendor is among them. The domain therefore carries a confirmed blacklist listing. No brand impersonation and no conflicting legal identities were observed, because the site presents no brand or legal identity at all. The behavioral findings add to the concern. In every automated run, the homepage contained hidden forms, including password-entry forms, and its page structure changed heavily after interaction. Those hidden forms sit behind a page that tells visitors nothing was found, which fits a credential-harvesting shell better than an abandoned deployment. Mitigating observations are that the forms did not post credentials to outside destinations, and that no wallet-connection, clipboard-hijack, drainer or cloaking behavior was detected. Separately, a handful of abuse reports exist against a shared platform edge address that this site resolves to. These reports apply to shared infrastructure used by many tenants, so they are weak evidence against this specific site and are not counted as an independent finding.

Evidence
  • Homepage: the captured page returned a "Site not found" notice with very little text, and no business, product or contact content.
  • Behavioral runs: hidden forms were detected in 3 of 3 runs, including password forms, with about 4,130 page-structure mutations after interaction.
  • External reputation: 3 engines rated the domain malicious and 1 suspicious, including a tier-one vendor, which produced the blacklist listing.
  • Shared edge address: 4 abuse reports with a very low confidence score, attributed to shared provider infrastructure rather than to this site.

Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page contains no company name, legal entity, terms, privacy policy, licensing statement or registration number. There is therefore no on-site identity or regulatory claim to assess. This is a content gap of the page itself. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record was matched, and the absence of a match is not a verdict on licensing. The site's real-world operator is not independently connected to any known brand or person. The valid certificate and clean transport-layer setup show only that the hosting platform is configured correctly. They say nothing about who controls this deployment or whether it is legitimate.

Evidence
  • Homepage: no legal entity, licence or registration details appear on the captured page.
  • Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
  • Transport encryption: the OV-validated TLS certificate was issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to the subject organization Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. It identifies the hosting platform, not the site operator.
  • Third-party broker dataset: no match.

What to Verify Next

Establish through an independent route how the link was received, and confirm with the supposed sender, by a known phone number or other offline channel, that they actually published it. If the address claims to belong to a known organization, compare it with that organization's officially published domains rather than with anything the page says. Confirm any financial or regulated-activity claim only against the relevant public registry. Re-check the domain's external reputation after the platform or owner has cleaned up the deployment.

Evidence
  • Homepage: the "not found" notice gives no contact route or verifiable identity to use as a starting point.
  • Behavioral runs: the hidden password forms are the main reason to confirm the link's origin before any interaction.
  • Reputation: the current blacklist listing should be re-checked after remediation.

Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated, clearly adverse risk posture. Confirmed external threat detections, together with hidden credential-capable forms on an otherwise empty page, outweigh the technical hygiene signals, and no legitimate operator identity has been established.

Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits on a major cloud provider's content-delivery layer, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The real origin server is not visible, so hosting cannot be verified independently, and content could be replaced without a visible change in infrastructure. This protective layer is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputational findings, since many unrelated tenants share the same edge.

Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, payments or any financial interaction. Any links received to it should be treated as untrusted until the sender and the domain are independently confirmed. Non-interactive viewing is the most that is appropriate, and nothing should be downloaded from it.

Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.

What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox.

01 External reputation

  • Several malware engines flagged this domain.External reputation rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH

02 Behaviour in a sandbox

  • The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS
  • Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH
  • The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH
  • The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION

Signals weighed against the site

  • AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

Identity verification

StatusUNKNOWN
Identity score50/100
Identity verification confidence30%
  • AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.

What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app.

  • The request stayed on portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
  • It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted

Domain intelligence

RegistrarNot available
HostingAMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US
CountryUS
Server IP2a05:d014:58f:6200::258
Name serversNot available
CDN / edge networkDetected (aws)
Resolved IP addresses4
Edge IP addresses4
Likely origin IP addresses0
SSL issuerDigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
SSL expiry2027-03-19
Domain ageNot available (no registration date was returned)
Domain expiryNot available
Archive first seenNot available
Archive snapshotsNot counted (archive lookup incomplete)
ReputationVirusTotal: 3 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches

About this assessment

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

Already paid or signed in? Do this now

Act fast. The sooner your bank knows, the better the chance of stopping the payment.

  1. Call your bank or card company now. Use the number on the back of your card. Ask them to stop or reverse the payment.
  2. Paid with crypto? Contact the exchange or wallet app you sent it from today. Give them the address you paid.
  3. Signed in or shared a password? Change it now, on every site where you use it, and turn on two-step sign-in.
  4. Report it to the police. In the US you can also report at reportfraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. In other countries, use your national police or fraud reporting service.
  5. Keep the evidence. Save screenshots, receipts, emails and chat messages. Your bank and the police will ask for them.
  6. Ignore anyone who offers to get your money back for a fee. These "recovery" offers are often a second scam.

Looking for the real site? Type the company name into a search engine yourself, or use the web address printed on your card, bill or letter. Do not use links from messages or ads.

Common questions about portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app

Is portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app a scam?

TrustSniffer's assessment of portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app found strong scam indicators. It scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-22, which is the critical-risk band. The specific signals are listed in the evidence above.

Is portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app safe to use?

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

What is the trust score of portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app?

portal-moonshot-68o.netlify.app scored 0 out of 100 on 2026-10-22, which places it in the critical-risk band. The score is built from the domain's age and registration history, its hosting and certificate, the content of the site itself, and third-party reputation data. There is no human rating and no user review in it.

Download this report as PDF Free, no account needed. Create one to keep a history of the sites you check.
By AminRez, Founder & Lead Security Researcher, TrustSniffer
Produced by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine · assessed 2026-10-22 · how we assess · report a mistake