Verdict
This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.
portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.
| What this site appears to be | Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error page stating that the requested path or site does not exist on Netlify. It contains no login, service, pricing, or commercial content. |
|---|
Evidence status and limitations
Evidence completeness: Not recorded
- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.
At a glance
The checks that decide most of this verdict.
| Malware engines | 6 flagged itVirusTotal | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listedGoogle | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidenceAbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports | Clear |
| Domain age | Not availableNo registration record was returned | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connectionIssued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02Server in US | Noted |
The page as captured
Key findings
- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.
Full analysis
Security Alert
Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.
The website is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform. It currently serves only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 page, which says the requested site or path does not exist and invites visitors to build their own site for free. No products, services, pricing, login or commercial content are presented, so the domain has no visible business model. The name suggests a "portal" style login destination, which does not match the empty page it serves.
Scam/Impersonation Risk
Contradictory signals are present, and they are the decisive factor in this assessment. Several independent security engines, including a major tier-one security vendor, currently flag the domain as malicious, which amounts to a confirmed blacklist hit. No confirmed phishing page, conflicting legal identities or verified brand impersonation were observed. The page analysis does flag a suspected lookalike of the hosting platform's own name, and that is a suspicion rather than a confirmed impersonation. The behavioural findings make the position worse. In every sandbox run, the near-empty error page contained concealed forms, including password-type fields, and it produced an unusually large burst of page-structure changes after interaction. A static 404 page has no legitimate reason to carry that much hidden interactive machinery. The pattern is consistent with a placeholder that can be swapped for credential-harvesting content, although no cloaking was detected and no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour was seen. Two abuse reports exist against an address in the hosting provider's shared network. They are attributed to shared infrastructure and discounted, so they carry no weight against this site. Evidence:
- Homepage: six security engines classify the domain as malicious, including a tier-one vendor, and the domain is also on an external blacklist.
- Homepage sandbox, three of three runs: hidden forms were detected, and password-type fields were present on a page that shows only a 404 message.
- Homepage sandbox: about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, against a visible page of roughly 368 characters of text.
- Hosting-network reputation: two abuse reports apply to a shared provider address and are discounted as shared-infrastructure noise.
Regulatory Verification Notes
The site gives no legal, ownership, licensing or registration information. Its only content is the platform's own error notice, so there is no operator identity to assess. No licence is claimed, and none is verified. The absence of disclosure is a verification gap and not evidence of wrongdoing on its own. Ownership opacity is an administrative limitation and not an identity contradiction. Real-world identity remains unverified, and nothing on the site connects it to a legitimate brand or person. The valid transport-encryption certificate is issued to the hosting platform, not to whoever controls this subdomain, so it shows that the connection is encrypted and says nothing about the operator. No third-party broker or regulator listing exists for the site. Evidence:
- Homepage: the page reads "Site not found" and shows no company name, address, terms, privacy policy or contact details.
- TLS certificate: issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1, OV validation, subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
What to Verify Next
The domain should be treated as an unconfirmed destination until its origin is established independently. Anyone who received the link in an email, message or advertisement should contact the sender through a separate, known channel and ask whether it is genuine. Any organisation claiming to operate a "portal" at this address should be asked to confirm the exact official domain. Where the domain appears in a security or fraud context, the hosting provider's abuse channel can report it and ask whether the site is still active. The domain should be re-checked later, because a placeholder page can be replaced with different content without notice. Evidence:
- Homepage: the page carries no operator information, so no on-site claim can be checked.
- Homepage sandbox: the page's hidden-form behaviour means any later content change could introduce a credential prompt.
- Reputation checks: the current malicious classifications should be re-checked after any clean-up or ownership change.
Summary Verdict
The assessment is critical and cautionary. Active third-party malicious classifications, together with concealed credential-capable form structures on an otherwise empty page, outweigh every mitigating signal. The operator's identity is unverified, and the evidence does not support treating this destination as a legitimate service.
Infrastructure Integrity
The site sits behind AWS-fronted edge infrastructure, and all four observed addresses are edge servers in the same Amazon network. The origin server was not observable, so independent verification of the real host is limited. Edge-only visibility can also conceal rapid content swaps. The protective infrastructure and the valid certificate are mitigating factors only. They do not offset the external threat detections.
Closing Assessment
No credentials, payment details or personal data should be entered on this domain, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Any message or advertisement that directs users here should be treated as suspect and reported. At most, the page can be viewed in a read-only, isolated manner.
Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report.
What the analysis found
3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.
01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it.External reputation
rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL
02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS - The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH - The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on.Behaviour in a sandbox
rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION
03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to.Page content
rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED
Signals weighed against the site
- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.
Identity verification
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
|---|---|
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |
- No on-site identity signals detected
Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence.
What TrustSniffer observed
First-party facts recorded during the assessment of portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app.
- The request stayed on portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. Clear
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. Noted
Domain intelligence
| Registrar | Not available |
|---|---|
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 6 flagged | AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports | Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |
About this assessment
A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about portal-moonshot-man.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.
TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.